Search for: "DOE CORPORATIONS 1-30" Results 121 - 140 of 4,981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 2:48 am by R. David Donoghue
The Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program and Wilson Elser are offering a CLE program entitled Ethics of E-Discovery on November 30, 2011 from 12:00-1:30 pm ct. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:34 am by James Vann
  The violation of this section becomes a Class 1 felony if the check amount is more than $2,000.00. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:20 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
The Administrative Tribunal of Québec will only be able to confirm or quash the contested decision (s. 141(1)). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
” 20 The CTA definition does not provide for entities to be “otherwise defined as a reporting company. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
., 2013 NY Slip Op 50007(U), Supreme Court, New York County A teacher employed by the NYC Department of Education for approximately 30 years challenged his receiving an unsatisfactory rating as a result of allegations of sexual misconduct and corporal punishment made by a student. [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:57 am
Ted set out three meanings of sustainability: 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:50 pm
(August 30, 2006), the Federal Circuit considered whether claim 1 of U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:11 am by Woodrow Pollack
Conair Corporation has substantial rights to U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:21 pm by Law Lady
LOUIS SAMANIEGO, Appellee. 2nd District.Dissolution of marriage -- Attorney's fees -- Jurisdiction -- Timeliness of motion -- Trial court erred in denying wife's post-judgment motion for attorney's fees based on mistaken belief that rule 1.525 divested it of jurisdiction to entertain motion for fees filed more than 30 days after judgment -- Rule does not apply to family law cases -- Fee proceedings in family law cases are governed by section 61.16, and that statute… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:26 am by The Complex Litigator
Oracle Corporation (June 30, 2011), the Court addressed (1) whether the Labor Code's overtime provisions apply to plaintiffs' claims for compensation for work performed in this state [with the ancillary question of whether the same claims can serve as predicates for claims under California's unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. [read post]