Search for: "DOES 1 - 3" Results 81 - 100 of 109,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-16, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the orders of the lower court denying a motion to quash.The appeals court held that the order was appealable, but rejected John Doe #3's arguments that :-the district court was without authority to refer the motion to the Magistrate Judge;-the complaint failed to state a claim for copyright infringement; -the "fair use" defense barred plaintiffs' case; and-the papers… [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:33 am by Docket Navigator
United Online, Inc., et. al., 1-13-cv-00343 (ILND May 3, 2013, Order) (Lefkow, J.). [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Alexander J. Davie
The primary benefit of qualifying as a 3(c)(1) fund – and the reason the majority of funds limit their offerings to qualify for this exemption – is that it does not have to comply with the additional investor status limitations applicable to 3(c)(7) funds. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:34 am by Liz Dunshee
Does your company allow insiders to voluntarily terminate a Rule 10b5-1 plan? [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 2:33 pm by Tracy Thomas
Russia Parliament Votes 380-3 to Decriminalize Domestic Violence Russia's parliament voted 380-3 on Friday to decriminalize domestic violence in cases where it does not cause "substantial bodily harm" and does not occur more than once a year. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
The Defendants argued that the Plaintiff's contentions did not comply with P.R. 3-1(d) because the Plaintiff made "impermissible blanket assertions regarding infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 1:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Accordingly, we agreewith the district court that Meng’s work does not exceedthe level of ordinary skill in the art.link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/14-1746.Opinion.3-31-2016.1.PDF [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 9:15 am by Peggy Cross-Goldenberg
Here, the court that issued the order of protection did not have …The post Enhancement under U.S.S.G. 2A6.2(b)(1)(A) for “violation of a court order of protection” does not apply if the defendant was not served as required by law appeared first on Federal Defenders of New York Blog. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:56 am by lbergeson@lawbc.com
The FOAs focused in three major areas: (1) Building Energy Efficiency Frontiers & Innovation Technologies; (2) Solid State Lighting; and (3) Building America. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:07 pm by Sutherland LNG
  The Finding states that based on (1) FERC’s environmental assessment prepared for the project; (2) DOE’s addendum on the environmental effects of gas exports, and (3) FERC’s order approving the project subject to conditions to protect the environment, DOE has determined that granting LNG export authority to DCP “will not have a significant effect on the human environment,” and the preparation of an environmental impact… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:36 am
PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 3 ( PLAINTIFF DOE 3 ) was at all relevant times herein an individual female residing in the County of Sacramento. 4. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 6:20 pm by Catherine Savard
This Policy Paper highlights that the PEs must respect the core principles of independence, impartiality and objectivity, pursuant to Articles 42, 21(3) and 54(1) of the Statute (see pp. 7-8). [read post]