Search for: "DOES 1 to 20, inclusive" Results 41 - 60 of 1,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Since this influence was not taken into account claim 1 was unclear and not supported by the description. [2.2.2] The Board does not share this position. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
As I’ve mentioned many times, lawsuits over buying competitors’ trademarks haven’t succeeded in court for about a half-decade; and even lawsuits over the inclusion of a competitor’s trademark in the ad copy rarely make much progress in court any more. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
Products 4U does not own the AdWord "Wintersteiger" on the Austrian Google.at. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:10 am by Michael Geist
One of the more surprising provisions in the TPP’s e-commerce chapter was the inclusion of a restriction on mandated source code disclosure. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:47 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Novelty (Article 100(a) and Article 54(1) EPC)Document (1) does not provide a direct and unambiguous disclosure of the feature of intramuscular injection and is thus not novelty-destroying for the subject-matter of claim 1.(...)5. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Feb. 13 – Mar. 14, 2014 inclusive). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pillar 1, Amount A Scoping Decisions This response focuses on three issues the Inclusive Framework should consider on Pillar 1, Amount A. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:52 am
A fair, common-sense reading of the affidavit presents probable cause to believe: 1. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:00 am by Sean Wajert
Blue Diamond Growers, No. 1:19-cv-08993 (S.D. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:24 am
Guenthner’s reports were filed with the Tribunal less than 20 days before the hearing, contrary to subrule 22(1) of the Rules. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
What was really going on and how does that get resolved? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:00 pm
The lawyers on our list graduated 10, 20 or 30 years ago. [read post]