Search for: "DOES 1-116" Results 141 - 160 of 1,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2020, 11:37 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Since a choice of court agreement is a term of the contract, does the principle of contract law apply to determine a choice of court agreement? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It submitted that there was no legal basis for holding OPs according to A 116 EPC 1973 at any other place than Munich and that, therefore, conducting OPs in The Hague amounted to a procedural violation. [5.1] The right to OPs pursuant to A 116 EPC 1973 is a codified part of the procedural right to be heard under A 113(1) EPC 1973. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm by Cindy Cohn
    [1] See, e.g., Charlie Savage, NSA Said to Search Content of Messages to and From U.S., N.Y. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
It follows from A 116(4) that OPs before the OD are public. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 2:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
With Bradford as the primary reference, VidStream does not appeal the Board’s decision of unpatentability of claims 1–35. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
This leads to a lack of clarity in the meaning of A 84 EPC 1973 since it is not determinable in which configuration the respective joining surfaces are related to one another in the piston assembly according to claim 1. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 7:46 am by Lex-Warrier
Shivam Goel Advocate, High Court of Delhi Abstract According to Sub-section (2) of Section 1 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as the TPA), it extends to the whole of India and as per Clause (k) of Section 2 of the TPA, “transgender person” means a person whose gender does not match with the gender assigned to that person at birth and includes trans-man or trans-woman (whether or not such person has undergone sex… [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
So, the legislators thought: "If nobody does this, let's take these rules out of the Code". [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 3:07 am
He was awarded the NJ State State Bar Municipal Court Practitioner of the Year. .... in section 2 of P.L.1987, c.116 (C.30:4-27.2), that does not require institutionalization, the court shall order the defendant to be provided appropriate treatment in the jail or prison in which the defendant is incarcerated. ... [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:46 am by Rose Hughes
 It does seem that, the closer one looks at the issue of plausibility, the thornier the questions become. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:17 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Document D9, taken as closest prior art, does not disclose the features of the characterising portion. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:41 pm by Arthur F. Coon
“In sum, the [broker’s] report does not provide the requisite basis for appellant’s challenge because (1) its analysis of causation was speculative, and (2) the potential economic consequences it identifies do not “mean that urban decay would result. [read post]