Search for: "DOES 1-116" Results 161 - 180 of 1,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 3:34 pm by Jeanne Huang
First, the fact that China does not recognize dual citizenship does not mean China is necessarily a Chinese citizen’s domicile. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The present decision is issued by written procedure without oral proceedings in accordance with Article 12(8) UPC 2020, respecting the procedural rights of the parties under Articles 113 and 116 EPC. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:17 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Opposition Division decided that:- the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request (patent as granted) was not new (Articles 100(a), 52(1) and 54 EPC);- the claimed subject-matter of auxiliary requests I and II failed to meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC;- auxiliary request III was not admitted into the proceedings pursuant to Rule 116 EPC; and- account being taken of the amendments made by the proprietor during the opposition proceedings (according to… [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The Appellant argues that the contested decision does not contain substantive grounds for the decision. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
So, now that the Stros are done with that, where does the club go from here? [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:45 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Request for oral proceedings - Article 116 EPCOral proceedings were appointed by the Board at the request of both the appellant and the respondent. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In G 4/92 [10], the EBA stated: “As regards new arguments, the requirements of A 113(1) have been satisfied even if a party who has chosen not to appear consequently did not have the opportunity to comment on them during OPs, insofar as such new arguments do not change the grounds on which the decision is based. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Since 1/1/2020, the revised  Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA2020) are in force. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
” 20 The CTA definition does not provide for entities to be “otherwise defined as a reporting company. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
  Justice Spender found that: claims 1 and 5 of the first innovation patent were not infringed by Bass, because the lowering of a chin plate or floor of the accused apparatus does not, in itself, allow or permit a fish to pass from the front to the exit of the device, as defined in the claims, but rather that, because additional components are involved, the mechanism in the Bass devices for achieving a unidirectional flow of fish is a substantially new or different mechanism… [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:01 am
Article 1 contains definitions for product, geographical and technology market. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Since independent claim 1 does not contain these features it does not meet the requirement following from A 84 taken in combination with R 43(1) and (3) that any independent claim must contain all the technical features essential to the definition of the invention. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Times Co., 828 F.2d 110, 116 (2d Cir. 1987)), using "'specific, on-the-record-findings,'" id. at 145 (citation omitted). [read post]