Search for: "DOES I-XX"
Results 81 - 100
of 404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2013, 12:10 pm
LinkedIn does not play nice with those who attempt to connect with people who do not know them, or at least have some semblance of a connection to them. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:08 am
Does the inclusion of aviation in the EU ETS violate the unconditional most-favoured nation obligation in Article I:1 GATT? [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:14 am
As someone who wrote a whole book about why it's a bad idea to make this particular accusation lightly, I have to agree with Melinda Henneberger that "supporting Hillary, or now McCain, over Obama does not a racist make. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 3:35 pm
How does it turn out, after a scientific analysis possible only in the late twentieth century, that the stains on both cloths lack a key genetic identifier for maleness? [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 9:50 am
(If I err in any respect in what follows, I trust a knowledgeable commentator will correct me.) [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
I have written about grading curves in posts such as Once Again, Grades are "Coming Out", Yet More Reasons to Dislike Grading Curves, The Artificiality of Mandatory Grading Curves, and Some Thoughts on Teaching Law: Part XX: The Art or Science of Grading. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:33 am
Unlike many of the paragraphs in Article XX of the GATT 1994 and XIV of the GATS, which specify that the measure must be "necessary" for achieving the legitimate objective, Paragraph 2(a) does not require that the measure should be the least trade restrictive means to achieve the stated objective. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 5:20 am
Article 36 Another option for Ukraine could be to invoke Art. 36 of the AA as an exception, which incorporates Article XX GATT. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:58 am
The post My Copyright is Unregistered: Can I Still Take Down Counterfeits from Alibaba? [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:08 am
Article XX does not provide that a border measure must be exactly the same as the domestic measure or that it must be non-discriminatory. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 8:22 am
As Scott does, I disagree with Mark. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 4:57 am
As Scott does, I disagree with Mark. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
XX, sec. 1 (emphasis added.) [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:29 am
Regardless of that issue, I'm going to use this as an opportunity to raise something that does not seem to be on the radar of many trade insiders, and when I do mention it every now and then, most people look at me like I'm crazy. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 7:55 am
If that's right, where does the SPS Agreement get us? [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 3:17 pm
” They have also retained the chapeau of Article XX and its nondiscriminatory requirement. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Ans – In my back it does; it never has quit hurting me. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:01 am
But if the measure does not do either of these things, on what basis do we determine the level of trade-restrictiveness? [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
" ($xx currently equals just under $14.3 trillion.) [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
” Would it surprise you to know that Pluot is a registered trademark of XX for a hybrid of plum and apricot fruit? [read post]
