Search for: "DOWNS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER" Results 41 - 60 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As is customary, I will note that my views are my own, and I am not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the staff. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
  Social media laws like HB20 are easily distinguished from those struck down on First Amendment grounds in Tornillo and its progeny. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On 1 February 2021 Rothman J handed down judgment in the case of Pan v Cheng [2021] NSWSC 30. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 13 April, Collins Rice J handed down judgment on meaning in the defamation case of Mehmood (Butt) v Dunya News Ltd [2022] EWHC 905 (QB). [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 11 July 2019 Master Cook handed down judgment in the case of Osagie v Serco Ltd and Ors [2019] EWHC 1803 (QB). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm by Derek T. Muller
It includes the American Coronavirus/COVID-19 Election Safety and Security Act, or ACCESS Act. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Richard L. Revesz
Supreme Court will soon hear argument on Seila Law v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am by Stewart Baker
  First up, Dmitri and I speculate on possible outcomes from the newly announced administration plan to convene 30 countries to crack down on ransomware. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 31 October 2016, Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Suresh v Samad [2016] EWHC 2704 (QB)). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On 27 July, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in George v Cannell [2022] EWCA Civ 1067, allowing the Claimant’s appeal. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am by Giles Peaker
In November 2017 Mr I was suddenly paralysed from the waist down. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 6 April 2022, judgment on meaning was handed down by Collins Rice J in Sivananthan v Vasikaran [2022] EWHC 837 (QB). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
There was evidence that there were occasions, for example, when young people had been restrained for failing to comply with instructions rather than because they threatened security or posed a risk to safety as laid down in STC Rules. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
This is due to the somewhat complicated interplay between New Jersey’s workers’ compensation laws and the Federal Social Security Act. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Canada CBC has highlighted comments made by the UK Information Commissioner regarding Canadian political parties’ data handling practices. [read post]