Search for: "DSL Service Company"
Results 81 - 100
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 2:53 pm
The rules prohibit DSL and cable companies from unfairly blocking services they don’t like and require them to be transparent about how they manage their networks during times of congestion. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:20 pm
Prior to 2003, new entrants could purchase the high-frequency portion of local telephone loops to provide their own DSL service. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:56 pm
In both the wireline and wireless environment where “toll free” data will operate, end users already are subscribing to monthly service: DSL, fiber or a hybrid fiber wireline broadband service, and/or cellphone service. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
Soon prospective Verizon customers can acquire DSL service if and only if they also subscribe to the company’s wireline telephone service. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:53 am
APIs make it possible for programs (and programmers) to use the services of a given program without knowing how the service is performed. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:50 pm
The DSL service offers even greater variety with higher price points for its fastest service and a very basic, cheap service of 3 Mbps with a 25 GB cap for $24.95 per month. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:37 pm
Unless you have a large company or purchase a great deal of bandwidth, you’ll likely have to take the terms offered by your telephone or cable company for internet access, whether by DSL, cable modem or wireless. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:18 am
The rules at issue allow cable and DSL subscribers to use the websites, programs and online services of their choice, and prohibit providers such as Comcast and AT&T from blocking or degrading services they don’t like — such as online video or internet phone calls that compete with those companies’ other offerings. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm
The rules prohibit companies from unfairly blocking services they don’t like and require them to be transparent about how they manage their networks during times of congestion. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:13 pm
Bush administration as a deregulation move, even though it’s tried to retain right to regulate DSL and cable companies. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 11:58 pm
The 700 MHz spectrum is particularly well suited for wireless broadband and holds the promise of an effective alternative for those seeking something other than cable or DSL services. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
The FCC has finally officially published long-delayed rules prohibiting cable, DSL and wireless internet companies from blocking websites and requiring them to disclose how they slow down or throttle their networks. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:33 am
Most companies used short titles without keywords. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
So is cable and DSL and WiMax, etc. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
So is cable and DSL and WiMax, etc. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:15 am
Pokey DSL high-speed Internet access, which operates over traditional copper phone wires, cannot compete with the cable distributors’ DOCSIS 3.0 connections; the differential is arguably more than Redskins v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:56 am
One of the hottest areas of competition in the telecommunication arena is between Verizon and its DSL Internet service and cable companies that provide high-speed Internet. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm
The FCC report shows that nearly all homes are passed by, at best, two broadband services: the local phone company, and the local cable company. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
Sonic.net has been around since 1994, selling DSL service in California, but it has recently expanded into fiber; the company has even secured the contract to manage Google's own 1Gbps fiber network that will connect 800+ faculty homes at Stanford University. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
This line, alone, presents a real challenge to companies like Afrihost (my DSL provider) which has become known for the vigour with which it promotes its services through giveaways like this iPad promotion: Fortune magazine recently reported how an ABC affiliate gave iPads away as part of an effort to promote the station, not realising that its giveaway contravened Apple's Guidelines for Third Party Promotions. [read post]
