Search for: "DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Auto Parts Company Agreed to pay $750,000 in Settlement for Tennessee EEOC Lawsuit over Drug Testing
10 Sep 2012, 6:58 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Dura Automotive Systems Inc for being in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the EEOC stated that the Dura Automotive Systems Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:58 am
The article profiled workers at the Dura Automotive Systems Inc. plant in Lawrenceburg, Tennessee who were terminated for testing positive for prescription drugs that Dura considered to raise safety issues. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (6th Cir. 11/3/10) [pdf], the 6th Circuit dismissed the claims of any of the plaintiffs who are not disabled under the ADA. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 5:55 am
Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently undertook to provide guidance on this issue. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:17 pm
Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., No. 09-6351 (6th Cir. 11/3/10). [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
While the appeals court remanded for a trial on those two issues, it upheld the jury’s finding that the employer’s drug tests were neither job related nor a matter of business necessity (Bates v Dura Automotive Systems, Inc, August 26, 2014, Cook, D). [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 9:29 pm
Fritz Faulhaber GmbH & Co., KG of Germany • Micromo Electronics, Inc. of Clearwater, Florida • TELEX Communications, Inc. of Burnsville, Minnesota • Bosch Security Systems, Inc. of Burnsville, Minnesota • Electro-Optics Technology, Inc. of Traverse City, Missouri • Nexteer Automotive Corp. of Saginaw, Missouri • Bunting Magnetics Co. of Newton, Kansas • Viona Corp. of Syosset, New York • Allstar… [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
Digital Access, Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom battle: (Ars… [read post]
