Search for: "Dan Farber" Results 21 - 40 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2021, 8:55 am by Eugene Volokh
Dan Farber expertly guides readers through multiple aspects of the topic, including constitutional text, methods of constitutional interpretation, and the roles played by law, politics, and history. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:28 am
Dan Farber & Larry Dignan The days of email as a mission-critical application appear to be limited, according to an IDC report. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:25 am
This artcle by Dan Farber of ZDNet introduces Mahalo, a search engine being developed by the developer of Weblogs Inc., now a part of AOL. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:28 am by kkaiser
Forbes, August 11, 2010 by Andrew Schenkel http://bit.ly/9bcyGe The University of California’s Environmental Law and Policy Blog describes Kagan as being much more liberal on the commerce clause, while favoring agencies like the EPA to implement policy. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:31 am by Tom Smith
“Scalia’s dissent … contains a hugely embarrassing mistake,” wrote University of California-Berkeley law professor Dan Farber. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 8:59 am
The Legal Theory Bookworm recommends Retained by the People: The "Silent" Ninth Amendment and the Constitutional Rights Americans Don't Know They Have by Dan Farber. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:28 am by Neil Siegel
Dan Farber of UC Berkeley Law School and I are thrilled to announce the publication of our new introduction to U.S. [read post]
10 May 2017, 11:20 am by Eugene Volokh
I want to echo Ilya’s recommendation of Politico’s instant symposium on the James Comey firing; I particularly liked these remarks from liberal Berkeley law professor Dan Farber, no fan of President Trump’s; I pass them along with Prof. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm by aling
Dan Farber writes for The Hill, Feb. 9, 2017 The regulatory process is very elaborate, and adopting a new regulation is a very expensive, time-consuming process. [read post]
20 Sep 2006, 8:01 pm
I just received a copy of Disasters and the Law, the new book by Dan Farber and Jim Chen (Aspen 2006, ISBN 0735562288). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:13 am by Tom Mayo
In a past life, he was an environmental activist (although Dan Farber, whose work I admire, is a skeptic on that [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:24 pm by Cara Horowitz
Congratulations to our LP colleagues Sean Hecht and Dan Farber for having been designated as expert reviewers of the IPCC 5th assessment report, to be published in 2014. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 2:55 pm
Blog entry by Dan Farber posted on ZD Net Blogs, March 20, 2007:   “Cognition Technologies entered the search engine arena with CognitionSearch, which applies linguistic analysis of queries and documents to render more precise results than the popular search engines for English language queries. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:24 am
" (The chapter is to be included in a collection on Law and Public Choice, edited by Dan Farber and Anne Joseph O'Connell and published by Elgar). [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 12:42 pm by Ilya Somin
[Legal scholar Dan Farber explains how the vast executive discretion created by current immigration law is incompatible with rule-of-law principles.] [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 4:19 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Farber, Dan Silverman, and Till von Wachter conducted the research and reported their findings in “Factors Determining Callbacks to Job Applications by the Unemployed: An Audit Study” (National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 21689, October 2015). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:38 pm by Ilya Somin
[Contributors include a variety of legal scholars, including, Jessica Bulman-Pozen, Dan Farber, and myself, among others.] [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:32 am
"  Richard Posner, Dan Farber, and Suzanna Sherry are perhaps the most well known American adherents to a pragmatic constitutional methodology. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:32 am
Dan Farber from the Between the Lines blog provided a report on his speech:The "Broken" Patent SystemCharacterizing the patent system as hurting innovation is a "fundamentally wrong" way to frame the debate. [read post]