Search for: "David Gore" Results 81 - 100 of 565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:55 pm by Ilya Somin
[Conservative legal commentator and experienced religious liberties litigator David French explains why.] [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:16 pm by Dan Bressler
” “The moves sent tremors throughout the national legal community because Boies Schiller is no ordinary firm, led by the famous trial attorney David Boies, who earned star status by grilling Bill Gates in the Justice Department’s antitrust case against Microsoft and then representing Al Gore in the 2000 Florida recount. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Gore, it was particularly jarring to see the conservative majority abandon conservative principles by extolling the unenumerated right to vote while overriding a state court’s interpretation of its own law. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Adham Sahloul, Shadi Hamid
Bush over Al Gore, but Bush’s invasion of Iraq and the Republican Party’s drift toward Islamophobia drove American Muslims toward the Democratic Party en masse. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
“Behind the constitutional arguments [in both Congresses] loomed the political fact that the Secretary of State was Thomas Jefferson,” David Currie has noted. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
 Gore that the justices issued rulings without reading decisions from the bench during an official public session. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:14 pm by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterNazi sympathizer David Irving just got three years in the slammer in Austria for various aspects of [...] [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 3:57 am by SHG
Still others call this bullshit, usually when their ox was gored. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Justice David Souter wrote the majority opinion for the Court, while Stevens wrote a dissent that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined.Stevens’s dissent was based on two core beliefs. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
As we explained in a column a few weeks ago, Part One in a series, an important federal lawsuit challenging Mississippi’s scheme for electing governors is wending its way through the federal courts. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Gore observed (uncontroversially affirming cases going back over a hundred years): The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm by Unknown
Nor do I mean the capacity—or inclination—of courts to produce social change against the tide of dominant political forces, which I shall call judicial independence.Extensions, Applications, and Friendly AmendmentsIn illuminating and complementary posts, David Marcus and Aaron-Andrew Bruhl draw attention to judicial capacity issues in the lower federal courts that I do not discuss at any length in my book. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As legal scholar David Post observed in a recent Volokh Conspiracy essay on the Baca case, the parties and their candidates choose their slates of electors. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Gore (in a part of the opinion that did not generate huge legal criticism or controversy) observed: The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. [read post]