Search for: "David Mercer"
Results 21 - 40
of 276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2022, 2:25 pm
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School The October 4, 2022 presidential decision awarding sanctions against OpenSky LLC and its counsel is here. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 2:08 pm
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Judge Albright granted Google’s motion to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) from the Western District of Texas to the Northern District of California in an opinion in Motion Offense LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:38 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School In Haynes Holding Group LLC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:58 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School After Prince, the musician, died an engineer who had unreleased recordings hired a Massachusetts firm who advised the engineer that he was a joint author of the recordings and jointly owned copyright in them, and so could distribute the recordings subject to paying Prince’s estate a share of royalties. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:06 pm
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School As a follow up to an earlier post, today the Ohio Supreme Court in Revolaze LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:02 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Judge Payne in Mobile Equity Corp. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 1:37 pm
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Dennis on the main page had written a couple months back about the opinion of Novartis Pharm. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:31 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Ordinarily, a conflict of interest leads to disqualification, but they can lead to fee disgorgement (an attorney is supposed to be loyal, and like any other agent, is not entitled to keep a fee earned while being disloyal) and, on occasion, damages. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 13.05 (2020). [10] 17 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 10:19 pm
David Hahn concluded it was a standard of review. [read post]
30 May 2022, 5:01 am
Swanson of the Federal Community Defender of the Eastern District of Michigan and David A. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Patent & Trademark Office, David Hricik of Mercer Law School, and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. will provide an overview of the ethical obligations of practice as well as the substantive law of inequitable conduct and related disciplinary matters, including several recent cases finding inequitable conduct despite the barriers created in 2011 by Therasense. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 5:59 am
Sec.), Joel David Briscoe (former Informals Hon. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:28 pm
All the 14 lawmakers (“plaintiffs”) are members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives: Timothy Bonner of Mercer County; Mike Jones of York County; David Zimmerman of Lancaster County; Barry Jozwiak and David Maloney of Berks County; Kathy Rapp of Warren County; Barbara Gleim of Cumberland County; Bob Brooks of Westmoreland County; Aaron Bernstine of Lawrence County; Timothy Twardzik of Schuylkill County; Dawn Keefer of York County; Dan Moul of Adams… [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 3:30 am
(Mercer) Coming Soon For The Unvaccinated: A $50 Monthly Paycheck Deduction From Your Employer (Forbes) Can We Charge Higher Health Insurance Premiums for Unvaccinated Employees? [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
One of my favorite jokes involves a visitor lost in rural Scotland. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Another excerpt from my Social Media as Common Carriers? [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:14 am
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School A partner at a major firm had been suspended initially for six months for intentionally over-billing certain clients for 450 hours of work she and other lawyers had not performed. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 7:40 am
By Kathy Gallagher, Jeremy Mercer and Carrie Garrison A divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court and held that the 1996 amended catch-all provision of the Pennsylvania Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (CPL) imposes strict liability. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 7:40 am
By Kathy Gallagher, Jeremy Mercer and Carrie Garrison A divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court and held that the 1996 amended catch-all provision of the Pennsylvania Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (CPL) imposes strict liability. [read post]
