Search for: "David Merrell"
Results 41 - 60
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
David Fletcher to serve as his expert witness to give his medical opinion that the railroad caused his injuries. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, in which the Supreme Court established the standards for the use of expert and scientific evidence in federal courts. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 599 (1993) (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (‘‘the various briefs filed in this case … deal with definitions of scientific knowledge, scientific method, scientific validity, and peer review—in short, matters far afield from the expertise of judges’’); Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals in 1993, creating a new “reliability” test for the admissibility of expert testimony in federal court, interested parties vigorously debated whether Daubert was a lax rule that would favor the admissibility of expert testimony, or a strict rule that would lead to the exclusion of a great deal of previously admissible expert evidence. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over a decade ago, Professor David Faigman asked whether science was different for lawyers. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 89 F.3d 594, 596-98 (9th Cir. 1996) (affirming exclusion of Dr. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:57 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
A sweeping article by George Mason University Law Professor David Bernstein, pointed out that, fantastically, many judges were either unaware of the amendment to one of the most important rules of evidence (really?) [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
A sweeping article by George Mason University Law Professor David Bernstein, pointed out that, fantastically, many judges were either unaware of the amendment to one of the most important rules of evidence (really?) [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:52 am
(David Bernstein) I was recently discussing with someone the record of the elite defense bar with regard to the law of expert testimony, and it’s not a happy history. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
” David L. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 4:16 pm
See David Kaye, “The Experts in Daubert. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
., Textbook of Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1, 13-14 (Phila. 1994); David F. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 948 (3d Cir. 1990), which contains a good discussion of epidemiological evidence. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, has solidified that trend. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 8:48 am
David L. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
David F. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
Kaye, David E. [read post]
