Search for: "David P Rowe"
Results 81 - 100
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
OTHER Steven David Catlin v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 4:53 pm
” Finally, the lawyers handling the arguments on Saturday, according to the NYT: For Wachovia, David Boies; for Wells Fargo, Wachtell’s Paul Rowe; for Citi, Gregory P. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:42 pm
David Lynn Jordan, 2010 Tenn. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 6:29 pm
Sent to death row. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
“My parents were row house kids. [read post]
12 May 2021, 7:26 am
Payne never should have been placed on death row. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
(App. at p. 19.) [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:09 pm
One D%&@ Thing After Another: Memoirs of an Attorney General by William P. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 2:08 am
David A. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 10:42 am
” Two experts on false confessions (including police trainer and interrogation expert, David Thompson, and Dr. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:18 pm
., David Booth Beers, Mary E. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:53 pm
Rowe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
” Briefly: At Greenwire, Jeremy P. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:18 am
Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 13.05[B][1], p. 13-193 (2002), is not fair use.He then goes on to trash the statutory test (and the Campbell formulation) by saying:We have thus far discussed the application of the fair-use doctrine in terms of the purpose of the doctrine rather than its statutory definition, which though extensive is not illuminating.I find the Posner approach more convincing. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 3:53 pm
Haney's article attempts to broach the gap between David Dow's much hyped position and that taken by the "innocent first" abolition crowd. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:18 am
Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 13.05[B][1], p. 13-193 (2002), is not fair use.He then goes on to trash the statutory test (and the Campbell formulation) by saying:We have thus far discussed the application of the fair-use doctrine in terms of the purpose of the doctrine rather than its statutory definition, which though extensive is not illuminating.I find the Posner approach more convincing. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:08 am
Hazel, a former district attorney; Montgomery County Deputy District Attorney Mary MacNeil Killinger; Penn law professor David Rudovsky, a noted local civil rights lawyer, and former federal prosecutor Gregory P. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
Briefly: At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Post pays tribute to Justice Ginsburg’s late husband, Marty, describing him as “truly one-of-a-kind. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
Commentary came from the editorial board at the Los Angeles Times, which argues that “[p]unishing a broadcaster for inadvertent remarks over which it has no control makes no sense. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Thus, as between O and P, if O has a right, then P has a duty, and if O has a privilege, then P has a no-right. [read post]
