Search for: "David R. Ames" Results 41 - 60 of 4,435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2023, 3:44 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Listen on mobile platforms:  Apple Podcasts |  Spotify Contact Us: Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠@gebauerm⁠⁠⁠⁠, or ⁠⁠⁠⁠@glambert⁠⁠⁠⁠ Voicemail: 713-487-7821 Email: geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.com Music: ⁠⁠⁠⁠Jerry David DeCicca⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠Transcript Marlene Gebauer 0:07 Welcome to The Geek in Review, a podcast focused on… [read post]
No one wants to spend 20 minutes logging in and pasting their résumé word for word into a company’s applicant tracking system (ATS). [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 3:36 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Listen on mobile platforms:  ⁠Apple Podcasts⁠ |  ⁠Spotify⁠ Contact Us: Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@gebauerm⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, or ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@glambert⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Voicemail: 713-487-7821Email: geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.comMusic: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Jerry David DeCicca⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠Transcript… [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
[The Supreme Court's misguided decision to grant Lorie Smith standing to pursue her entirely hypothetical claim against the State of Colorado in the web designer case.] [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm by admin
Many journalists struggle with reporting the results from risk factor epidemiology. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
There was no response to the r 10.3 letter, and the writer did not elected to become a party opponent. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 10:56 am by Roger Parloff
“[R]ather, we concluded that they were based on the prosecutors’ assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I am grateful for the engagement of all of the commentators. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Ass’n Am., Ltd., No. 22-448 (U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
For example, a lawyer moving from one firm to another might find herself expected to participate in a case in which she was involved in her former firm; this might raise questions of confidentiality, as well as adherence to other law society rules (R. v. [read post]