Search for: "David Starr v. United State" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At The Least Dangerous Blog, Joel Nolette explains why a decision by the justices to grant the pending cert petition in Starr International Company, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
There have been three landmark cases issued by the Supreme Court during the last generation or two concerning the extent to which the presidency and the executive branch should be immune from legal and judicial processes and orders that would require disclosure of executive information and/or consumption of executive time: the famous Nixon Tapes case, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
Michael Flynn’s contacts with the Russian ambassador to the United States, were likely protected by executive privilege. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A Haiti orphanage founder and a U.S. charity have been awarded more than $14 million combined in damages, after a Maine activist who publicised sexual abuse allegations against them was found guilty of defamation. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Starr v Ward, heard 15-19 and 22 to 24 June 2015 (Nicol J)   [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
United States A jury is considering the merits of a $850 million libel claim in the case of Bouveng v Wey. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  The trial began with evidence from Mr Starr whose cross-examination by David Price QC was reported in the Daily Mail. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 9 June 2015 there was a PTR in the case of Starr v Ward before Nicol J. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
United States The Minnesota Court of Appeals has held that the state’s criminal libel law which allows for punishment of up to one year imprisonment and/or a fine of up to $3,000 for libellous statements is unconstitutionally overboard. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Marty Lederman
Following up on the recent posts by Joey Fishkin and David Gans on the Evenwel case that the Court has decided to hear, I thought it might be worth posting the argument made by the United States the last time this issue reached the Court, in the government's brief in opposition to certiorari in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm by Ritika Singh
Barbara Starr of CNN’s Security Clearance blog informs us that the United States and Pakistan have agreed to work together to develop a more inert version of a fertilizer that has been used by terrorists to make IEDs and other bombs. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
David Barr, junior inquiry counsel, questioned the journalist over a full transcript of the meeting with Atkins during which he was offered fabricated stories about famous individuals having cosmetic surgery. [read post]