Search for: "David V. Adler" Results 61 - 80 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm by Dan Bushell
From the get-go, the question has been whether two of the brightest legal minds out there -- David Boies, whose famous cases include representing former VP Al Gore in Bush v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:59 am by David Bernstein
Carpenter, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:03 am by Howard Bashman
Adler has a post titled “On the Eve of Argument in California v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:51 am by Kali Borkoski
Wednesday’s argument in Snyder v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  The series editors are Mirko Canevaro, Edward Harris, and  David Lewis. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by Kiera Flynn
United States David Savage at the Los Angeles Times has coverage of yesterday’s decision in Tapia v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:16 pm
Jonathan Adler of the Volokh Conspiracy reports here on the limits of the Court's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:14 pm by F. Tim Knight
” In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Jonathan Adler discusses the “concerns” expressed by Justice Scalia in his Talk America v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:11 am by Jonathan H. Adler
A forthcoming article in the Columbia Law Review by Professors David S. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm by Marissa Miller
” At the Volokh Conspiracy, Jonathan Adler discusses Texas’s decision to retain Latham & Watkins in the case. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm by Molly Runkle
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:07 am by Ilya Somin
Jonathan Adler, David Bernstein (see also here), Phil Magness (also here), Russell Roberts, and Michael Munger, and others, have highlighted some of her most important fallacies and distortions. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that the petitioner in Kahler v. [read post]