Search for: "David V. Adler" Results 121 - 140 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard argument in Husted v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Earlier this summer, the Environmental Law Institute’s Environmental Forum featured a cover story on the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, David French explains why National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:32 am by Ilya Somin
Jonathan Adler has also never said that the issue is an obvious one. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
He's posted a PDF of Jones v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
Over 30 amicus briefs were filed in support of the government’s position in King v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am by David Kopel
Among the articles I look forward to reading are the VC's Ilya Somin on the vaccine mandate cases and Jonathan Adler on West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:59 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The panel opinion was written jointly by Judges David Tatel and Sri Srinivasan. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on yesterday’s argument comes from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Jonathan Adler at the National Review’s Bench Memos, and David Gans at the New Republic. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 8:49 am
 My own views are summed up in this post: Holder v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) Andy Koppelman has another essay, this time in the New Republic, analogizing the litigation over the ACA to the Child Labor Cases. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:32 am
Circuit in Combat Veterans for Congress Political Action Committee v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, David Rivkin and Lee Casey welcome “Justice Samuel Alito’s lone concurrence” in Gundy v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
Jonathan Adler, writing for the Volokh Conspiracy, looks back at Kagan’s 1995 comments on judicial confirmation hearings and notes that her views on the appropriateness of probing questions may have changed since then. [read post]