Search for: "David W Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:02 am
Thomas W. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
David Smith dispute: masculine abstract expressionist, Cubi XII, April 7, 1963. 109 5/8 by 49 ¼ by 32 ¼ inches; Lauren Clay, No side to fall into, 2012 paper and acrylic, 18 ½ by 7 by 3 inches—triggered a C&D. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
[A reply to Prof. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
The announcement puts the justices in a pivotal position with echoes of the court’s involvement in the 2000 election, when its decision assured victory for George W. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
“Could George W. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Edmund Burke, Reflections on the French Revolution (W. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:12 am
Sentencing Guidelines by David Aaron 3. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
July 19, 2007) (concluding that the "defendants' description of [the plaintiff] as a racist" was, as a matter of law, "an opinion and thus is not actionable"); Smith v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 8:21 pm
David Brock Smith (R), would have removed SMRs from the regulatory portfolio of the state’s Energy Facility Siting Council. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:37 am
Fern Smith The Biden Impeachment Inquiry: A Heedless Descent into Constitutional Anarchy by Frank O. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
Barnes, Eric Schmitt, David E. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm
In the federal indictment of Trump, Special Counsel Jack Smith describes Chesebro as “an attorney who assisted in devising and attempting to implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding” and whose “memoranda evolved over time from a legal strategy to preserve [Trump’s] rights to a corrupt plan to subvert the federal government function by stopping Biden electors’ votes from being counted and… [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Christiani,*Richard W. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
Background In October of 1970, American photojournalist W. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:11 am
He is right that the outcome from Smith’s prosecution will be terrible. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
A jury convicted W. [read post]
