Search for: "Davis v. Scope Services"
Results 61 - 80
of 366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
Z.o.o. and Ors v Jakubowski and Ors. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze an important and interesting decision, Demers v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
July 3, 2023, settled) SEC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, and Davis v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
Consider Davis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
Finally, as Education Week, Appellate Daily, and Courthouse News Service report, the Court granted certiorari in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
Blockowicz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 pm
Davis – (1) Regenerative Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
The courts, of course, followed by many academics, have a quite different view (Cooper v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
The Supreme Court recently handed down its judgment in the case of Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas Plc [2015] UKSC 71 (read our Case Preview here). [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:34 am
Davis, for SM Architects, PLLC and Roger Stephens, Appellant. [read post]
24 Dec 2000, 2:00 am
" Conceivably, the meet and confer process implemented by a Board of Directors could include use of a mediation service. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:33 am
See, AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 (2007); Keld v Giddins Claman, LLP, 170 AD3d 589, 589 (lSt Dep’t 2019) . [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:45 am
Lane v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
” The court has yet to decide on whether it will hear a similar case, Davis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Minora's decision in the case of Davis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am
” After various facts played out and an unhappy client sued, said the Court: “‘An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
