Search for: "Davis v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
§ 1, cl. 1, likewise vests the executive Power in “the President of the United States of America. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:04 pm
National Institute of Justice; United States Department of Justice. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/chiefs-panel-points-top-issues-and-related-innovation-needs-facing-law-enforcement Police Executive Research Forum. (2021, June 11). [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Davis v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
As I explain in more detail below as I parse the complaint in the United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm
United States 21-68Issues: (1) Whether Standard Condition 12 of the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Discussion of executive privilege, in turn, usually triggers reference to United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
Johnson (1866), the Supreme Court observed that "the President is the executive department. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
United States (argued and briefed as Dalmazzi v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
§ 546, provides that “the Attorney General may appoint a United States attorney for the district in which the office of United States attorney is vacant,” so long as the person appointed by the AG is not someone whom the President has tried to appoint as U.S. attorney but whom the Senate has “refused” to confirm, and so long as the AG’s appointment does not last more than “120… [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
As established in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
This Court has explained: "It is axiomatic that the courts must be independent and must not be subject to the whim of either the executive or legislative departments. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
Siebert, 56, filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta after Judge Mark E. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
The second new relist, Davis v. [read post]
