Search for: "Day v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 41 - 60
of 513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
We leave that balancing for another day. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:31 am
The way the service works is that the person who believes he or she may be the beneficiary of the deceased loved one's life insurance i) creates a Requestor's Account, ii) certifies to NAIC that he or she has made a diligent search of the deceased's records and property and has asked family members, iii) the requestor submits the deceased's name, birthdate, date of death and social security number to the service, iv) NAIC makes the information available… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
created the biggest stir of the day (to Pangloss’s silent cheers) by mentioning almost casually that, at least in relation to security, he had never had much time for user education. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2022. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:12 pm
The key to our true security lies in addressing social and economic problems by dealing with them as fundamental rights, and the sooner we can realize this the safer and more prosperous we will all be. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The Commission is a securities regulator without statutory authority or expertise to address political and social issues. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am
It was an integral part of the move to combine tax allowances and social security benefits into a seamless tax credit system [30]. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:07 pm
They asked why the IRS seems to be ignoring that 2010 decision—United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
Of course, the Model Law also protects personal information defined to include a consumer’s identifying information in combination with one or more of the following: (i) Social Security number, (ii) driver’s license number or non-driver identification card number, (iii) account number, credit or debit card number, (iv) any security code, access code or password that would permit access to a consumer’s financial account, or (v) biometric records. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:52 am
See White v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
If plan participants are able to pass their costs through to industry members, a possibility the Approval Order recognizes,[11] nobody with financial skin in the game will be among those setting or reviewing the budget, or among those able to propose amendments to the plan or involved in day-to-day discussions about interpretation or implementation of the plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:45 pm
As our Los Angeles employee misclassification attorneys can explain, this issue has become so problematic because employees who are wrongly classified as independent contractors lose out on a host of employment benefits, including minimum wages, overtime, health insurance, tax breaks and underpayment of things like Social Security, Medicare, etc. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
My blog for @CenDemTech about why this is v. worrisome. https://www.cdt.org/blogs/gs-hans/0611overbroad-subpoena-airbnb-user-data-smacks-general-warrant … “Does the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
On the same day the libel trial in the case of Gubarev v Orbis Business Intelligence will begin before Warby J. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
R (Moos and Anor) v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 957 (Admin) – Read Judgment The High Court has decided that the actions of police in “kettling” climate change protestors during the G20 summit were unlawful. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Title V also excludes persons who received shares pursuant to employee compensatory plans in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act from counting against the number of holders of record. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Posted Conference Paper: "The Problem of Labor and the Construction of Socialism in Cuba"). [read post]
