Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 41 - 60
of 40,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2017, 7:01 am
” The Court found that the Act “does not support [defendant’s] argument or provide any basis for upholding dismissal of [plaintiff’s] claim. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:35 am
[M]erely being cumulative of other prior art does not invoke § 315(e)(2) estoppel. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:37 am
Earlier this month, the Court ruled that: (1) a party must “prevail” before it can recover any attorney’s fees under the DTSA and (2) a plaintiff’s dismissal of its claims without prejudice does not confer the “prevailing party” status on defendants. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:34 am
Eli Lilly and Company et al, 2-15-cv-01202 (TXED February 26, 2016, Order) (Bryson, C.J.) [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:11 am
As always in cases such as this, the favorable ruling by the appellate court does not mean that the plaintiff has won his case. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:15 pm
John Does 1-16 Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-00370-JVB-APR File Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Plaintiff: Patrick Collins, Inc. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:03 am
John Does 1-11 Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-00294-PPS-APR File Date: Monday, July 30, 2012 Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLC Plaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 11:32 am
Inc., 14 Cal.4th 479, 489). [2] Id. at *5. [3] Id [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:11 am
Medical Components, 2-12-cv-00032 (UTD July 25, 2012, Order) (Furse, M.J.). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm
I, section 2, clause 3 or the vicinage clause of the Sixth Amendment bars a retrial. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
” The Act empowers a court to grant a criminal defendant relief from a mandatory minimum sentence, but that relief is available only if “the defendant does not have” “more than 4 criminal history points,” “a prior 3-point offense[,] . . . and . . . a prior 2-point violent offense. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Does 1-41, and 3 other cases, under caption "In re Cases Filed by Recording Companies", which ordered the RIAA to cease and desist from that practice, but which the RIAA has simply ignored for the past 2 1/2 years, just in case anyone's thinking of making a contempt motion:November 17, 2004, Order, in Fonovisa v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Bank N.A. and Does 1 through 25 (yet to be named or fictitious defendants). [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 7:55 pm
"High court: Public defenders need not release records; Ruling orders 2 attorneys to jail, settles dispute between judges. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:51 pm
Defendant #1 is 10 percent liable, and defendant #2 is 90 percent liable. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:17 am
Circle K Stores, Inc., 2-11-cv-00405 (TXED August 14, 2012, Order) (Schneider, J.). [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
§ 315(e)(2), since [defendant] 'raised or reasonably could have raised' any such contentions in its IPR petition. . . . [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:58 am
Hussmann of the Southern District of Indiana has denied a Motion to Quash Subpoena filed by Defendant Doe No. 2 in First Time Video v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 3:17 am
Judge Kendall: 1) denied defendant Doe 15′s motion to dismiss; 2) denied Doe 15′s motion to quash the subpoena of Doe 15′s internet provider; 3) granted Doe 15′s unopposed motion to remain anonymous; and 4) severed each of the 15 defendants, except for Doe 15 in this Bit Torrent copyright case. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 11:09 pm
In the 10th Kohli Memorial Lecture on 'Criminal Justice System - growing responsibilities in light of contemporary challenges', delivered on 2 April 2009, the Chief Justice of India defended the recent amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure thus:The legislative intent behind giving this discretionary power to the police is to reduce the high incidence of arbitrary and unnecessary arrests that take place in our criminal justice system. [read post]
