Search for: "Dept. of Correctional Services" Results 61 - 80 of 538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Considering criminal conviction in determining qualification of an applicant for employment in the public serviceMatter of El v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 50883(U), Decided on April 1, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Alice Schlesinger [This opinion will not be published in the Official Reports.]Civil Service Law Section 50.4 provides for the disqualification of applicants or eligibles for appointment in the Classified Service and states that:… [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:25 am
Comm'r, New Hampshire Dept. of Corrections, 2009 U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services of New York v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 73 NY2d 26, the Court of Appeals held "whether a document qualifies as a personnel record under Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) depends upon its nature and its use in evaluating an officer's performance — not its physical location or its particular custodian. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services of New York v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 73 NY2d 26, the Court of Appeals held "whether a document qualifies as a personnel record under Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) depends upon its nature and its use in evaluating an officer's performance — not its physical location or its particular custodian. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
Understanding that combating misclassification requires a multi-pronged approach, WHD has entered into memoranda of understanding with many of these states, as well as the Internal Revenue Service.1 In conjunction with these efforts, the Administrator believes that additional guidance regarding the application of the standards for determining who is an employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or “the Act”) may be helpful to the regulated community in classifying workers… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:26 am by John Diekman
Corp., NY Slip Op 01442 (2d Dept. 2012).Here is the decision. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:17 pm
As the Court of Appeals has written, "[b]ecause CPL 380.20 and 380.40 collectively provide that only a judge may impose a [postrelease supervision] sentence, we conclude that DOCS may not do so" (Matter of Garner v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., ___ NY3d ___, ___ [Apr. 29, 2008]). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Claimants were civil service employees working full-time at facilities operated by the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision [DOCCS]. performing services as either educational supervisors or instructors or teachers for incarcerated individuals. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Claimants were civil service employees working full-time at facilities operated by the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision [DOCCS]. performing services as either educational supervisors or instructors or teachers for incarcerated individuals. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Correction Officers' Benevolent Association [Petitioner] filed an  Article 78 petition to challenge a determination by New York City Board of Collective Bargaining [BCB] which concluded that New York City Department of Corrections [DOC] and the City of New York [City] did not commit an improper practice under the City Collective Bargaining Law [CBL] when it altered the procedures pursuant to which correction officers represented by Petitioner… [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Correction Officers' Benevolent Association [Petitioner] filed an  Article 78 petition to challenge a determination by New York City Board of Collective Bargaining [BCB] which concluded that New York City Department of Corrections [DOC] and the City of New York [City] did not commit an improper practice under the City Collective Bargaining Law [CBL] when it altered the procedures pursuant to which correction officers represented by Petitioner… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court was correct in determining that Jakubowicz's termination was arbitrary and capricious.* The Village submitted two appeals, denominated Appeal 1 and Appeal 2, but dismissed Appeal 1 as academic in view of its ruling with respect to Appeal 2.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_02059.htm [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" However, there is no dispute that a hearing was never held.Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court was correct in determining that Jakubowicz's termination was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]