Search for: "Dept. of Public Works and Transportation" Results 41 - 60 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2020, 9:04 am by Monica Williamson
Pueblo of Laguna Legal Assistant, Dept: Pueblo Courts. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  And where once hermeneutics formed the core challenge of law when it moved from theory to working system, now the "facticity" of data becomes the foundation on which data driven governance, and compliance, are founded. 1. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
He claims that the county accused him of mismanaging public funds as a pretext to fire him for being gay. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
This constantly shifting balance between public and private rights means that this area of the law is constantly changing and evolving. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
Oliveira countered that the court lacked authority because §1 of the Act excepts from coverage disputes involving “contracts of employment” of certain transportation workers. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 12:51 pm by Wally Zimolong
Dept of Transportation The case involved a PLA that PennDOT had negotiated with the Philadelphia Building and Construction Trades Council (the “Unions”) for a project in Montgomery County known as the Markley Street Project. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The employer's annual reviewing and approving requests for the assignment an agency vehicle to an employee does not create a past practiceSpence v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2018 NY Slip Op 08594, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCertain employees serving with Department of Transportation [DOT] were assigned state-owned vehicles for work and, in some instances, several employees seeking to use the vehicle for commuting as well as for work was… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The employer's annual reviewing and approving requests for the assignment an agency vehicle to an employee does not create a past practiceSpence v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2018 NY Slip Op 08594, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCertain employees serving with Department of Transportation [DOT] were assigned state-owned vehicles for work and, in some instances, several employees seeking to use the vehicle for commuting as well as for work was… [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm by Anthony Zaller
Dept. the company “failed to establish that truck driver was free from its control within the meaning of part A of the ABC test, where the company required driver to keep truck clean, to obtain the company’s permission before transporting passengers, to go to the company’s dispatch center to obtain assignments not scheduled in advance, and could terminate driver’s services for tardiness, failure to contact the dispatch unit, or any violation of the… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Her bankruptcy schedule J shows that she has $2,902 in monthly living expenses, including $400 for rent, $800 for food, $200 for clothing, $553 for transportation, $100 for medical and dental, $200 for recreation and entertainment, and $489 for vitamins, health and beauty aids and a gym membership. [read post]
The court also rejected claims of unusual circumstances noting that petitioner’s purported unusual circumstances regarding: (1) view obstruction and the uniqueness of Telegraph Hill were considered in the City’s general plan; (2) aesthetic impacts for certain infill projects are no longer considered significant impacts due to the enactment of Public Resources Code section 21099, subdivision (d)(1); and (3) the unusual topography and geology of the site were adequately addressed… [read post]
The petitioners argued that there were unusual circumstances due to “the inherently noxious and controversial nature of a portion of Planned Parenthood’s services” which would cause significant environmental impacts (traffic, parking, public health and safety, noise, etc.) due to protests that would occur as a result of the approval. [read post]
The petitioners argued that there were unusual circumstances due to “the inherently noxious and controversial nature of a portion of Planned Parenthood’s services” which would cause significant environmental impacts (traffic, parking, public health and safety, noise, etc.) due to protests that would occur as a result of the approval. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:57 pm
’”[7]It is noteworthy that Columbia, shortly after the peace settlement ending fifty years of civil war turned its attention to the control of criminal corruption, in response to corruption scandals involving transnational corporations that reached to the office of the president of the republic.[8] “Already seven people have been jailed in the case, including a former senator and an ex-vice minister of transport. [read post]