Search for: "Deutscher Tennis Bund"
Results 41 - 59
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2014, 4:10 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund (which held that fee-shifting bylaws were permissible). [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:00 pm
Deutscher Tennis Bund] to non-stock corporations, and to make clear that such liability may not be imposed on holders of stock in stock corporations. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 3:46 pm
Deutscher Tennis Bund that a... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
31 May 2014, 4:00 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund, et al., which held that nonstock corporations may dopt bylaws that require unsuccessful plaintiffs engaged in... [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:44 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund (see these memos posted in the “Securities Litigation” Practice Area). [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:18 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund] to non-stock corporations, and to make clear that such liability may not be imposed on holders of stock in stock corporations. [read post]
23 May 2014, 5:53 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund,(No. 534, 2013, May 8, 2014), highlighted on these pages, regarding the ability of a corporation to provide in its bylaws for a stockholder to pay the legal fees of a suit against the corporation when the stockholder loses that suit. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:00 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund¸ the Delaware Supreme Court held that a... [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:41 am
The Deutscher Tennis Bund and the Qatar Tennis Foundation sued the ATP in U.S. [read post]
21 May 2014, 2:44 pm
Deutscher Tennis Bund. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:02 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund, concluding that fee-shifting provisions in the bylaws of a Delaware corporation are facially valid under Delaware law and enforceable even against parties who joined the corporation before the bylaw was adopted. [1] Although this opinion arose in the context of a non-stock corporation, as discussed below, the opinion is relevant to traditional stock corporations as well. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:34 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund that a by-law provision shifting attorneys’ fees and costs to unsuccessful plaintiffs in intra-corporate litigation can be valid and enforceable under Delaware law. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:31 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund – a fee-shifting by-law that required plaintiffs to bear the costs of intra-corporate litigation if the plaintiffs were not successful on the merits or did not achieve “in substance and amount, the full remedy sought. [read post]
10 May 2014, 2:04 pm
Deutscher Tennis Bund, Del. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:00 pm
Deutscher Tennis Bund, et al., the Supreme Court of Delaware upheld a fee-shifting provision in a non-stock corporation's bylaws, providing that unsuccessful plaintiffs in intracorporate litigation would be required to pay the fees... [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 2:00 pm
The panel will be open to the public.Topics will include the NFL lockout, the possible NBA lockout, age and autonomy restrictions on professional athletes, digital media and the law, antitrust and sports, and many other topics.Yale Law SchoolYale Entertainment and Sports Law Association hosts a Panel Discussion on Sports and the Law: Current IssuesApril 4 2011 6:00 to 8:00 p.m.Room 120Moderator:MICHAEL MCCANN (Vermont Law School Professor of Law/Director of Sports Law Institute & Sports… [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:15 pm
Thus, the jury was properly instructed to analyze the alleged restraints under the rule of reason, and their finding that the Federations failed to prove the relevant market defeated the Sec. 1 claim.The decision is Deutscher Tennis Bund v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm
Deutscher Tennis Bund v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:02 pm
The case is Deutscher Tennis Bund, et al vs. [read post]
