Search for: "Diamond Decisions Inc" Results 141 - 160 of 459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 8:38 pm by Alex Gasser
  All respondents except Double Diamond Distribution Ltd., Holey Soles Holding Ltd., and Effervescent, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 5:53 pm
By Eric Goldman Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v. 3M Co., 2008 WL 4346798 (S.D. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:02 am
" Jim and Alexis Bellino's home is owned by a single-asset company, Global Marine, Inc., which filed for bankruptcy that month. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:19 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
  The decision challenges the famous quote about patentable subject matter from Diamond v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Gene Quinn
Those who feel the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Morton David Goldberg, Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, New York, New York, for amici Alliance Entertainment Corp., Audible Inc., Blue Spike, Inc., The Clandestine Group, Inc., Digimarc Corporation, Digital Media on Demand, Inc., FullAudio Corporation, InterTrust Technologies Corporation, Oak Technology, Inc., Reciprocal, Inc., RioPort, Inc., RPK SecureMedia Inc., Verance Corporation, and VNU USA, Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:40 pm
Excel Commc'ns, Inc., 172 F.3d 1352 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:23 am
DB Investments, Inc., No. 08-2784, will appear at 2010-2 Trade Cases ¶77,090.Further information regarding CCH Trade Regulation Reporter appears here on the CCH Online Store. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Diamond, The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration, 80 Geo. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
”  Following the Lexmart decision, one federal district court found there was standing, holding in pertinent part, “Diamond’s central allegation is that TET solicited Diamond customers with deceptive advertisements and then induced them to breach their contracts with Diamond, thereby alleging an injury to its commercial interest in sales and bringing Diamond’s claim within the zone of interests protected by the Lanham… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 2:56 pm
“ Myriad argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in Diamond v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm by Andrew Frisch
In Harris, we considered the appropriateness of summary judgment where a plaintiff testified that her jeweler had replaced a diamond in her ring with a smaller, less-valuable diamond. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm by Andrew Frisch
In Harris, we considered the appropriateness of summary judgment where a plaintiff testified that her jeweler had replaced a diamond in her ring with a smaller, less-valuable diamond. [read post]