Search for: "Diane G. Kindermann"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 4:00 pm
For more information click here to view the Conference Brochure. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2019 2nd Quarter cumulative CEQA update. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Katherine J. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2018 2nd Quarter CEQA update. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:11 pm
” Diane G. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2017 3rd Quarter cumulative CEQA update. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2017 3rd Quarter cumulative CEQA update. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2017 Annual CEQA update. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2018 3rd Quarter CEQA update. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
Abbott, Diane G. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
If you have any questions about these court decisions or about CEQA, contact Leslie, Bill, Cori, Kate or Partners Diane Kindermann and Elizabeth Strahlstrom. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
Abbott, Diane G. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
By Diane G. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
All of us at Abbott & Kindermann, Inc., wish all of you a happy, healthy, and fruitful 2021. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2013 CEQA update. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
City of Oakland (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 884: The city's significance threshold to evaluate seismic impacts did not violate CEQA for two reasons: (1) there is no requirement that a significance threshold be formally adopted; and (2) the significance threshold used substantially conformed to the significance threshold for service impacts in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. [read post]