Search for: "Digital Generation Inc"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2023, 7:45 pm
The 2015 Authors Guild Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:51 pm
According to the complaint, the asserted patents generally relate to novel methods of straightening teeth. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 12:59 pm
(U.S.S.C., Feb. 21, 2018, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:27 am
" Snap Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 7:28 am
Expected growth in the digital economy’s share of GDP will be driven primarily by next-generation technologies like 6G internet and big data. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:01 am
The US Supreme Court has given generic drug manufacturers a favorable signal by not staying the mandate of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in an ongoing battle over a patent infringement. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 8:19 pm
The '415 patent relates to "the generation and use of an improved device profile that describes spatial and color properties of a device within a digital image processing system. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:18 pm
On April 15, 2010, Apple, Inc. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:45 am
" In re Apple Inc., Serial No. 86857587 (January 13, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Mark Lebow). [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:57 am
Enforcement SEC Takes Civil Actions Against Fraudulent ICO On April 2, 2018, the SEC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Centra Tech., Inc. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:24 pm
According to the complaint, the ‘220 patent generally relates to a digital video field identification system for use in digital televisions, the ‘958 patent generally discloses a novel frame structure and synchronization system for a digital television, and the ‘251 patent generally relates to a television system that includes an improved trellis coded modulation (TCM) reception system for error correction. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:29 pm
Openet Telecom, Inc., No. 1:10cv910 (E.D.Va 2013), the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia faced a motion to tax costs in this patent infringement case. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Coinbase, Inc., No. 18-934 (E.D.N.Y., January 24, 2019), a man, Sultan, signed up for an online account with Coinbase, Inc. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:27 am
Be aware that you could be the target of a lead generation service, and it is wise to steer clear of such entities. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Overall, the trio allegedly repeated this activity across 25 digital assets which, according to the indictment, allowed defendants to generate unrealized gains of at least approximately $1.5 million. [read post]
Patent for Extracting and Embedding Digital Images Within a Video Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101
13 Mar 2017, 7:29 am
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 132 S. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:51 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently granted summary judgment in favor of Youtube, Inc., owned by Google, Inc., holding that Youtube qualifies for “Safe Harbor” under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
[Refusal of BRODDCAST for "Multimedia software for digital content creation of entertainment videos using electronic media; multimedia software for digital video recording, editing and playback of videos; multimedia software for digital recording, editing and playback of entertainment videos; downloadable software for digital recording, editing and playback of entertainment videos"].In re Silhouette America, Inc., Serial No. 86228926 (March 1,… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 6:21 pm
The Comptroller’s Office has reason to believe that a number of companies subject to the Digital Ad Tax have declined to make the estimated tax payments required by Tax-General §§ 7.5-201(b), 7.5-301(b). [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 8:23 am
Last week, New York Attorney General Letitia James announced that online travel agency Fareportal Inc., which operates several travel-related websites and mobile platforms, including CheapOair.com and OneTravel.com, will pay $2.6 million to New York for misleading consumers with deceptive marketing tactics. [read post]
