Search for: "Dillards Inc" Results 81 - 100 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
See In re Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 186 S.W.3d 514, 515 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
In re Dillard Department Stores, Inc. is another example of the Texas Supreme Court’s strong policy favoring arbitration. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 8:25 am
Equal Opportunity Commission) entered into an agreement with prominent national retailer Dillard's Inc., in settlement of a lawsuit regarding incidents of sexual harassment in violation of Title IV of the Civil Rights Act. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 8:59 am
National retail giant Dillard's, Inc., will pay $110,000 to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit involving two male employees. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:05 am
Santa Ana, CA - James Brady and Patricia Brady filed suit at the Federal District Court in Santa Ana against Quicksilver Americas, Inc., Radio Fiji, Dillard's Inc., B. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:53 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.Kerr v Dillard Store Services, Inc, ___F.Supp. 2d___(D. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 7:00 pm
Highlights include:   The proposal that asked companies to issue a sustainability report was adopted by six companies: Allegheny Technologies; Capital One Financial Corp.; CIGNA Corp.; Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.; Dillard's, Inc.; and, Regions Financial Corp. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP Dragon) Amendments to the PRC patent law (IP Frontline)   Ethiopia Ethiopia streamlines trade mark formalities (Afro-IP) Europe Blind readers seek guarantee of access under EU copyright law (Intellectual Property Watch) CFI dismisses Philip Morris' appeal against OHIM's persistent refusal to register the shape of its cigarette packet as a community trade mark (IPKat) CFI rules PAST PERFECT not descriptive for musical recordings: TIM The International Music Company AG,… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:12 am
Judge Love found the patent to be invalid because it was an obvious combination of teachings from prior patents.IPBiz notes that there are apparently some patents that ED Texas does not like.The winning defendants were Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC; Nordstrom, Inc.; The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.; Gap, Inc.; Federated Department Stores, Inc.; Dillard's, Inc.; Bragel International, Inc.; and Ce Soir Lingerie Co., Inc.,… [read post]