Search for: "Discovery Communications, LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 1,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 10:51 pm by Kelly Lavelle
Reprinted with permission from the January 26, 2024 edition of “The Legal Intelligencer” © 2024 ALM Media Properties, LLC. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 1:45 pm by Patricia Salkin
Fuchsberg Touro Law Center The appellants, The Homeless Charity, Sage Lewis LLC, and Sage Lewis, submitted a request to the Akron City Council in September 2018 for a conditional use variance to allow a campground tent community for the homeless on property owned by Sage Lewis LLC. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 1:47 pm
Hellerstein denied plaintiff Alcorn Communications, LLC's motion to strike defendant Marketwire, Inc.' [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
Incorporating LitScope’s proven review technology into our current breadth of eDiscovery expertise further reinforces our position as a trusted provider of comprehensive discovery and trial support services to the legal community. [read post]
21 May 2018, 7:11 am by Mack Sperling
No, said Judge Bledsoe, in his Opinion late last month in Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
By order dated August 31, 2012, the Court granted the petition of Sodexho Management, Inc., Sodexho Operations, LLC and Linda J. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:54 am
--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Surety, LLC, the leading provider of data integrity solutions, today announced that Howrey LLP partner John J. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:11 pm by Mack Sperling
No, said Judge Bledsoe, in his Opinion late last month in Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 8:14 am
With the ever continuing conversation in the legal technology community about electronic discovery pricing, a new white paper,  A Paradigm Shift: Corporations Battle The E-Discovery Cost Crisis With Per Document Pricing, provides a salient look into ways for corporations to both consider per document pricing and establish a per document pricing program for the overall e-Discovery process. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:20 pm by Christopher H. Blaszkowski
Amended Rule 26 was promulgated with the intention of obviating the “undesirable effects” of routine discovery into attorney-expert communications provided by the majority view. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:45 am by Christopher Simon
First, despite the defendants’ protestations otherwise, evidence of face-to-face or telephone communications is not necessary for a showing that a party attempted to confer about discovery in good faith. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Similarly, inquiry about communications the expert had with anyone other than the party’s counsel about the opinions expressed is unaffected by the rule. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:08 am by Peter Mahler
According to the Second Amended Complaint ultimately allowed by the court, the two defendants as sole managing members of Upper East Side Suites, LLC, formed in Delaware in 2007, solicited investors from Italy’s business community who contributed $4.75 million to buy the UES Building to operate a short-term rental business. [read post]