Search for: "Discovery Communications, LLC" Results 61 - 80 of 1,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2016, 6:45 am by Christopher Simon
First, despite the defendants’ protestations otherwise, evidence of face-to-face or telephone communications is not necessary for a showing that a party attempted to confer about discovery in good faith. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:19 pm
Good planning makes for less litigation By Tim Cedrone Hagenbuch v. 3B6 Technologies, LLC, 2006 U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Due to Giuliani's discovery conduct, plaintiffs have filed two motions to compel production from Giuliani and his eponymous businesses, Giuliani Communications LLC and Giuliani Partners LLC (collectively, the "Giuliani Businesses"), resulting in two discovery hearings, the issuance of multiple orders seeking his discovery compliance or otherwise sanctioning him for noncompliance. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:30 am
From a press release of Sept. 21, 09 by Article One:Article One Partners, LLC has discovered new prior art impacting the validity of two Minerva Industries, Inc. patents for mobile entertainment and communications devices. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm by Danielle N. Craft
Indeed, as Ondigo LLC v. intelliARMOR LLC reflects, ignorance of the various sources of e-discovery cannot shield attorneys or parties from sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(g) or 37(e). [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm by Danielle N. Craft
Indeed, as Ondigo LLC v. intelliARMOR LLC reflects, ignorance of the various sources of e-discovery cannot shield attorneys or parties from sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(g) or 37(e). [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm by Danielle N. Craft
Indeed, as Ondigo LLC v. intelliARMOR LLC reflects, ignorance of the various sources of e-discovery cannot shield attorneys or parties from sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(g) or 37(e). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:35 am by Stan Gibson
In this patent infringement action, AT&T filed a motion to compel certain litigation-funding discovery from the plaintiff, United Access Technologies, LLC (“UAT”). [read post]