Search for: "Do v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 43,116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
As the change of gender and first name was acquired, the United Kingdom was also still a Member State. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:53 am
And if you think that Israel is having a hard time with “Palestinian peaceful protesters”. just wait until China invades Taiwan and the word goes out from TikTok to Gaza by the Potomac to start condemning the Taiwanese breakaway province and imperialist protectorate of the evil United States. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
For example, some states ban marijuana, while others do not. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:47 am
Machinists v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
L. 112-40 (2011) applied to PUA benefits, as PUA benefits qualify as an “unemployment compensation program of the United States” for which a minimum 15% administrative concealment penalty must be charged. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard): On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Many either do not know or have forgotten that two Delaware cases were consolidated with those from three other states and the District of Columbia under the umbrella of Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC summarily states that a “hypothetical monopolist of accessible luxury handbags likely would undertake a SSNIPT on consumers” and could do so profitably. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
The Court denied Du Pont’s request to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s judgment affirming the jury’s $40 million award in favor of plaintiffs, a married couple, asserting negligence claims against Du Pont. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:43 am
See Adolph v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:38 am
Louis, Missouri, No. 22-193, which was then pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
