Search for: "Doe 1-20"
Results 141 - 160
of 27,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Juvenile Male, No.11-30065 (1-20-12)(McKeown with Guy and Tallman).The issue of "Who is an Indian" is raised in this juvenile matter. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 1:56 pm
Since the biennial ownership report requires filers to provide their ownership information as it existed on October 1, 2013, broadcasters normally have sixty days after the October 1 reporting date to prepare and submit their reports. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:32 am
Black & Decker's CEO Does the Right Thing? [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 10:23 am
Thus, we do notsustain the rejection of claims 1, 17, and 21 and of their dependent claims 2,3, 7-11, 16, 19, and 20 as unpatentable over Nunes and Elzinga. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The cited decision of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH XII ZR 20/94) speaks certainly not in favour of the intervener. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 11:55 pm
Tr. of John Doe 1 in Taylor v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:21 am
Jane Doe, 56, formerly of New Port Richey, faces up to 20 years in prison when she is sentenced July 1. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 1:59 pm
Commissioner, 1 B.T.A. 236, 240 (1924); Philadelphia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 12:08 am
The most recent one I received came this week and said: "Effective November 1, 2007, Smarter.com will apply a 20% cost per click increase to base CPC rates across all categories. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:52 am
Glassman for a free and confidential appointment — 1-888-367-2900. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:41 am
¶¶ 1, 20. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 8:09 am
Effective July 1, 2021, Tennessee’s Constitution Carry law allows individuals over the age of 21 (or military members between ages 18 to 20) to carry a firearm, both concealed and open, with or without a carry permit. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
We will look at this judgment in more detail soon, but for now what you need to know is: The courts can review whether a person is a "child" for the purposes of the Children Act 1989, this is a separate question to whether they are "in need"; Ordinary domestic judicial review can be adapted to deal with this where necessary; If s.20(1) does give rise to a "civil right" for Art 6 purposes it is close to the boundary of that concept (per… [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
We will look at this judgment in more detail soon, but for now what you need to know is: The courts can review whether a person is a "child" for the purposes of the Children Act 1989, this is a separate question to whether they are "in need"; Ordinary domestic judicial review can be adapted to deal with this where necessary; If s.20(1) does give rise to a "civil right" for Art 6 purposes it is close to the boundary of that concept (per… [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
” (modified quote from pp. 20-21). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:54 pm
The Court did note two exceptions to the general rule:(1) unauthorized extensions of authorized breaks, and (2) breaks taken for the purpose of expressing breast milk.The latter exception actually arises out of Obamacare (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act), which requires employers to provide nursing mothers with breaks to express breast milk but does not require employers to pay them.See also: DOL News Release Pennsylvania marketing company owes at least $1.75M… [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 6:43 am
The ADEA generally only covers employers with 20 or more employees, but does that 20-employee cutoff apply to state entities (including political subdivisions)? [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
John Doe #1 et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 9:50 am
As of July 1, 2007 the ER is closed.The nearest trauma center is at least 20 minutes away at Grady Hospital.So why is the ER closed at Dekalb General? [read post]
