Search for: "Doe 1-8"
Results 41 - 60
of 32,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 7:56 am
On June 24, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Doe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:35 pm
The Supreme Court issued an 8-1, precedential decision in Scott v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 1:34 am
” “(2) Does Proposition 8 violate the separation-of-powers doctrine under the California Constitution? [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:41 pm
Matter of E-R-M- & L-R-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 520 (BIA 2011) (1) Section 235(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 11:42 am
Advanced Image Direct LLC, et. al., 8-12-cv-01090 (CACD January 30, 2013, Order) (Carter, J.). [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:16 am
–5:30 p.m. on August 15, 2017, and from 8:30 a.m. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 1:20 pm
June 8, 2020), the Court held (in an opinion by Judge Walker) that a New York conviction for fifth-degree criminal sale of a controlled substance, in violation of N.Y. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:28 am
Holder:Issue: (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain? [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 9:15 am
Opinion at 8. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 3:23 pm
and won a motion to maintain identity as a John Doe for the present (decision March 1, 2012. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:29 am
Shan Enterprises, that New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1, et seq., does not apply to the sale of an ongoing business. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 11:59 am
City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775, 787 n.8, 789 n.10 (9th Cir. 1993). [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:38 am
I//8/8) certainly can and the Commerce Clause (Art. 1/8/3) probably can provide such protection. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
A third person said that the outage was 1 to 2 hours and there was substantial confusion. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 6:31 am
In FDRLST Media, LLC, 370 NLRB No. 49 (2020), the Board reaffirmed its longstanding principle that a violation of Section 8(a)(1) does not depend on the employer’s motive or tone. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 5:39 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/6zzUoFRtC-8" height="1" width="1"/> [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 5:22 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/1q_6RmIywHM" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:39 pm
By an 8-1 vote (with Justice Thomas dissenting), the Supreme Court in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor upheld--while limiting--the SEC's power to seek disgorgement in fraud cases. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
1. [read post]
