Search for: "Doe 74"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2017, 4:34 pm
The 74-page DoD report provides extensive and detailed reporting on war-related appropriations and expenditures. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 11:50 am
Patent and Trademark Office published a notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment regarding the Requirements for Patent Applications Containing Nucleotide Sequence and/or Amino Acid Sequence Disclosures (74 Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
The post What Religious and Racial Hatred Does to American Criminal Justice appeared first on . [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Cites to Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The new IRS notice does not state an effective date for implementing the updated safe harbor notices. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The new IRS notice does not state an effective date for implementing the updated safe harbor notices. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:20 am
The patent, which expires in August 2011, covers the ratio between the two components.Of the legal aspect of the case-->The majority and dissent disagreed on the outcome as to claims 43-48, 51, 54, 67, 69, 72, and 74.Does (A + B +C +D) render (A + B) obvious? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 1:29 pm
U.S. law does not require a correction in the same way Canada does. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 4:43 pm
Some time ago I was contacted by an angry client who had lost an appeal. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:07 am
How far does the definition reach? [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
For example, how does one link to an exhibit in a 30-year old registration statement that was filed as one gigantic ASCII file? [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:51 pm
A 74-year-old woman was denied the right to buy beer at a convenience store in Norwalk, California, the Associated Press has reported. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:09 pm
Stanford Law Review, 74 STAN. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:30 am
Anita Bernstein (Brooklyn Law School) has posted Implied Reverse Preemption (Brooklyn Law Review , Vol. 74, No. 3, 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 3:59 pm
The statute is Civil Rights Law section 74, entitled - Privileges in action for libel. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:43 am
Cross, No. 11-74.Does it violate the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment when a witness testifies at a defendant's first trial, with cross-examination, but disappears before the retrial, and the prior testimony is read at the second trial? [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 8:14 am
Currently, the summary information available does not point to any cuts for TBI programs and in order to avoild calling attention to the line item, we ask that grassroots take action next week only if it becomes necessary. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:00 am
Last week, a 74-year-old woman died after sustaining catastrophic personal injuries in a car accident. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 1:25 am
Without Mr Wilkie, the numbers will be 74-74 each. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm
But does the standard of patent validity actually matter? [read post]
