Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-100"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
Here is an example of how the 100-to-1 ratio works: an individual who deals five grams of crack cocaine faces the same sentence as a defendant who deals 500 grams of powder cocaine under the Guidelines. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:54 am
This exposes defendants to much harsher penalties in the federal criminal justice system. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm
There is no reason why Rule 416 could not be applied by individual defendants in litigation targeting several hundred “Doe” defendants at a time. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 8:27 am
The average tenure of an Assistant PD is down from 6 1/2 years to 2 1/2 years. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 pm
Hickland, 100 A.D.2d 643, 644 (3d Dep’t 1984)) [read post]
13 May 2010, 5:30 am
Sheets, 313 U.S. 100, 106-08 (1941) stated that the federal law authorizing removal by a defendant does not include removal by a counter-defendant. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 2:12 pm
Longard Services Ltd., 2014 NSPC 100 (CanLII) [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
§ 924(j)(1), among other offenses. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:11 pm
What does the SCOTUS ruling – and other recent, important DUI law fluctuations – mean for your case? [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:38 am
" Specifically, the defendant argues that the § 53-202k sentence enhancement provision does not apply (1) to an unarmed coconspirator and (2) to an unarmed accomplice who was not present during the commission of the felony. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Does 1-100, 18-cv-01754, Northern District of Illinois; Samuel v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:56 pm
DOE #1 ET. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:21 am
Rosenwinkel, No. 113569 – Does the Farm Nuisance Act, 740 ILCS 70/1, bar a nuisance suit where defendants started a cattle operation on property across from an unoccupied farmhouse, and several years later, plaintiffs demolished the farmhouse and constructed a new family home? [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:00 am
Federal District court dismissed Plaintiff's law suit against the County defendant upon concluding that the County’s False Alarm Law [1] did not violate the due process rights of County alarm owners; [2] did not effectuate an unlawful taking under the Fifth Amendment; and [3] did not violate New York state law. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:00 am
Federal District court dismissed Plaintiff's law suit against the County defendant upon concluding that the County’s False Alarm Law [1] did not violate the due process rights of County alarm owners; [2] did not effectuate an unlawful taking under the Fifth Amendment; and [3] did not violate New York state law. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:46 pm
Specifically, during the pendency of the litigation, nonparty Bio-Rad Laboratories had acquired 100 percent of Defendant Celsee, Inc. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:30 pm
It reduces the disparity between crack and powder cocaine penalties from 100:1 to 18:1. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:00 pm
He is an experienced trial lawyer, having tried well over 100 cases, and is co-chair of the firm’s litigation group. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:36 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, of Defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are currently unknown to PLAINTIFFS, who therefore sue said Defendants by such fictitious names. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 11:28 am
" Gunter slip op. at 28.Thus, as long as the district court does not categorically reject the 100:1 ratio in step one, it is free in step three to consider what the result of a different ratio would be as it exercises its discretion and treats the guideline range "as simply advisory. [read post]
