Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 21 - 40 of 12,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This knowledge was acquired, plaintiffs allege, "through decades of experience and reflected in [defendants] own admissions" including the knowledge of the public school system's "racist character and outcomes. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:38 am by Holly
The group walked us through inventorship determination examples for AI-assisted inventions based on factors borrowed from Pannu v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I think the adoption of the Private Benefit Corporation statute casts doubt on whether you can get there through private ordering. 7. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am by Eric Goldman
I haven’t tracked it through its permutations to see how its caption evolved into “Unknown Parties v. [read post]
I couldn’t see making [my students] sit and listen to this as if [the loud protests] were background music.Once again, the abortion-clinic-protest setting is instructive. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Distinctions can be justified in some cases. 'The doctrine of the equality of States . . . does not bar . . . remedies for local evils which have subsequently appeared,' (citation to South Carolina v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 In deciding such immunity questions, the Court assumes that the statute in question does validly bind the defendant and that he violated it--just as it did in Fitzgerald, and just as it does in qualified immunity cases. [read post]