Search for: "Doe Entities 1-25" Results 61 - 80 of 2,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Marco Rossi
Also, the literal definition of “beneficial owner” used in the IV Directive in case of trusts does not make any distinction between an interest in the income of the trust, as opposed to an interest in the corpus of the trust, and does not refer to any minimum ownership requirement such as the 25 percent ownership threshold that applies in case of corporate entities. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Marco Rossi
Also, the literal definition of “beneficial owner” used in the IV Directive in case of trusts does not make any distinction between an interest in the income of the trust, as opposed to an interest in the corpus of the trust, and does not refer to any minimum ownership requirement such as the 25 percent ownership threshold that applies in case of corporate entities. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:48 am by Jack Pringle
Section 12-2-25(B)(1) also plainly provides that a single-member LLC not taxed as a corporation "is not regarded as an entity separate from its owner" for purposes of all taxes contemplated by Title 12. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:25 am by Intellectual Property Group
Importantly, this ruling DOES NOT affect the legal obligation of entities formed in California, Nevada, or Delaware (among other states) to file their BOI Report within the timeframes specified in the chart below at this time. [read post]
As we reported previously, CCPA will apply to any entity that does business in the State of California and satisfies one or more of the following: (i) annual gross revenue in excess of $25 million, (ii) alone or in combination, annually buys, receives for the business’ commercial purposes, sells, or shares for commercial purposes, alone or in combination, the personal information of 50,000 or more consumers, households, or devices, or (iii) derives 50 percent or more… [read post]
15 May 2021, 4:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Board held claims 1–17 and 23–25 of the ’552 patent invalid for obviousness in view of U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Admissibility of the appealThe inadmissibility of the appeal as argued by the patentee in its last submission dated 25 October has two prongs: either because the opponent was no longer registered at the date the appeal was filed, or because the opponent was subsequently taken over by a different entity without this change having been notified.Whether an opponent to an ongoing opposition/appeal case can validly be regarded as a legal entity and act in these proceedings is a… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:03 am by Sarah E. Straub
For entities existing on or after January 1, 2024, the deadline for reporting is ninety (90) days after the entity is formed. [read post]
The Fed’s guidance (provided in the form of a “Frequently Asked Question,” or FAQ) clarifies that foreign public funds (e.g., UCITS [1]) will not be considered banking entities merely due to their boards being controlled by an affiliate (i.e., an affiliate within the BHC capable of holding a majority of a fund’s director seats). [2] However, with only weeks to go before the July 21, 2015 deadline, the FAQ does not resolve two other questions that… [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
Michel Pierson Holdings: (1) The conversion of preferred stock to cash in connection with a cash-out merger does not violate the redemption provisions of the preferred stock, when the transaction at issue does not constitute a redemption. (2) The conversion of preferred stock to cash in connection with a cash-out merger does not violate the provisions of the preferred stock that establish a limitation upon the right of preferred stockholders to convert… [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 1:57 am by Fiona Folkson
     holds directly or indirectly more than 25% of the shares or voting rights in that entity; 2. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:00 am by Asher Bearman
That status causes the limited FFI or limited branch to be subject to FATCA withholding but does not disqualify the expanded affiliated group from becoming non-compliant FFI through 2015. [read post]