Search for: "Doe Governmental Entities 1-50"
Results 41 - 60
of 334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 5:01 am
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has also been engaged, with over 50 bills introduced on similar issues, among them sustained legislative attention to emergency response and disaster management. [read post]
17 May 2023, 8:44 am
“Consumer” means an individual resident or domiciled in Florida and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:28 am
Under section 106(a) of the Code, Congress abrogated the sovereign immunity of “governmental units” for more than 50 Code provisions, including the automatic stay intended to stop debt collection while a bankruptcy case proceeds. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:31 am
Accordingly, I hereby order: Section 1. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
The House approved the bill by a margin of 67-50-1 on May 28, 2013. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
Consider, for instance, the following three questions that such a textual analysis ignores. 1. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:50 pm
It does say that it anticipates only a “limited” number of Connect America funded experiments, with total Connect America support of perhaps $50-100 million. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 5:00 pm
By contrast, governmental entities such as counties, municipalities, and public water districts, which are exempt from tax under Code Section 115, are not subject to the excise tax. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most… [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:03 pm
The United States has fundamental national security and foreign policy interests in (1) ensuring that technology is developed, deployed, and governed in accordance with universal human rights; the rule of law; and appropriate legal authorization, safeguards, and oversight, such that it supports, and does not undermine, democracy, civil rights and civil liberties, and public safety; and (2) mitigating, to the greatest extent possible, the risk emerging technologies may… [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 1:40 pm
The focus of that emerging strategy was US responses to Chinese policy in Xinjiang and the instrument was the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC), which developed a simultaneous projection of power leveraging "he distinction between the governance of the societal sphere (markets based and structured through private law arrangements), and the governmental or political sphere (the sphere of governmental authority grounded in political authority and … [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 3:44 pm
Likewise, any paid leave employers may have provided for COVID-19 related reasons prior to April 1, 2020 does not count toward these paid leave obligations. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities.[1] He is also an adjunct professor at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:43 am
Most organizations and entities will be eligible for tax incentives of between 30 and 50 percent of the project’s total cost, depending on the project’s location and how much of the hardware content is produced domestically. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
Parts 500-598) (issued under the authority of numerous statutes, including the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:19 pm
The Act also prohibits taking the same actions against any workers who wear their own personal protective equipment (PPE), such as masks, faceguards, or gloves, at any worksite where the PPE (1) provides a higher level of protection than the PPE afforded by the employer or other entity covered by the Act, (2) is recommended by the applicable public health agencies, and (3) does not prevent the workers from performing their jobs or fulfilling their duties. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm
For rural areas to be better served, Barnes says it may take an initiative of an educational nature or an initiative by a governmental entity. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 2:04 pm
See 50 USC 1861(b)2(A). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:47 pm
The City and other governmental entities are not covered employers under the ordinance. [read post]
