Search for: "Doe II v. Doe I" Results 1 - 20 of 12,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Performs an Emergency Service or Function The entity provides one or more of the following emergency services or functions to a population equal to or greater than 50,000 individuals: (i) Law enforcement; (ii) Fire and rescue services; (iii) Emergency medical services; (iv) Emergency management; or (v) Public works that contribute to public health and safety. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by Bret Cahn
But, practically speaking,[2] the statute limits standing to make that written request to (i) the principal, (ii) a monitor, (iii) a co-agent, or (iv) a successor agent (see GOL§ 5-1505[3][a]). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York State Court of Appeals has held that the City Human Rights Law, one of the most expansive in the nation, does not allow plaintiffs to sue co-workers for discrimination, including the creation of a hostile work environment.The case is Russell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
The AI-related hook does not make this case itself an “AI-related” case, and I have not counted it as such. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II The Catholic Herald reported AI priest avatar gets the chop in first week of digital ministry: “The ‘Fr. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
A person is the alter ego of an LLC only if (i) the LLC is influenced and governed by the person; (ii) there is a unity of interest and ownership such that the person and the LLC are inseparable; and (iii) adherence to the notion of separate persons would sanction a fraud or injustice. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
I explained that "receiving a 'political benefit' does not transform an otherwise legal action (like requesting an investigation) into an abuse of power. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
The Chief Justice does not look kindly at what Counselor to the Special Counsel, Michael R. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:18 am by Ryan A. Glasgow and Jason P. Brown
Non-compete agreements, as defined by the Final Rule, do not include (and are, therefore, not prohibited by the Final Rule):  (i) non-competes that prohibit employees from competing against employers during their employment; (ii) sufficiently tailored non-solicitation provisions; (iii) non-compete agreements entered into in conjunction with  sale of a business; and (iv) franchisee/franchisor agreements (but it does prohibit non-compete agreements with employees… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The court held that (i) the summary of the merger agreement in the proxy statement is not sufficient to satisfy such requirement because the “Proxy Statement is not the notice” and (ii) the copy of the merger agreement attached as an annex to the Proxy Statement was insufficient, because, at a minimum, it omitted an essential document appended thereto, i.e., the surviving corporation’s certificate of incorporation. [read post]