Search for: "Doe Message Sender"
Results 121 - 140
of 680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2015, 6:13 am
However, a private party’s notice does not mean there has been any legal ruling. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
In T 1326/06, for instance (reported and translated here), Board 3.5.06 had found that “methods for encrypting/decrypting or signing electronic messages have to be considered to be technical methods, even if they are essentially based on mathematical methods. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 5:54 am
A message to pension plan administrators: please take this seriously. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:14 pm
This does not prevent the recipient from reporting abusive or unlawful messages, including now-decrypted content an [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] E-Mails With Graphic Anti-Gun Messages, Sent to Gun Rights Activist, Weren't Threats
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm
The dismissal does not affect the claims against the other defendants. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] E-Mails With Graphic Anti-Gun Messages, Sent to Gun Rights Activist, Weren't Threats
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm
The dismissal does not affect the claims against the other defendants. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:55 am
• Check the legitimacy of the domain or sender’s address. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
A “commercial electronic message ” or “CEM” is broadly understood as any electronic message that encourages participation in a commercial activity. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:45 am
For this attack, it isn’t important whether the sender or the receiver of the original secret message is targeted. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:19 am
This means that it can’t guarantee only the sender and recipient can access messages across all endpoints, as it does currently. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 12:10 pm
CASL Exemptions There are a number of exemptions to section 6 of CASL (the unsolicited CEMs section), which, if met, mean that section 6 does not apply at all (i.e., none of the three core requirements of CASL – consent, sender identification and an unsubscribe mechanism – are required). [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
As you correctly guessed, each individual message (and link within each message) is assigned a unique tracking code. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 12:18 pm
Sept. 20, 2018) Related posts: “Manufactured” TCPA Suit Fails For Lack of Standing Does Two-Factor Authentication Violate the TCPA? [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 6:45 pm
October 31, 2021 Does your business send commercial electronic messages (CEMs) to existing or prospective customers or other parties? [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 2:58 am
November 7, 2021 Does your business send commercial electronic messages (CEMs) to existing or prospective customers or other parties? [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 2:58 am
December 10, 2021 Does your business send commercial electronic messages (CEMs) to existing or prospective customers or other parties? [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:33 pm
The virality of a message and thresholds do not change the privacy and due process rights of the original sender. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:04 am
The TCPA, the marketers note, surely does not mean to define every telephone or device as an ATDS subjecting the sender to liability for every unsolicited call or text message to a mobile phone. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 9:43 am
Requesting read receipts: Does the sender not trust recipients to read emails? [read post]
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
§ 2703(D), a Texas magistrate, requiring me to produce records pertaining to the sender of certain email messages from Annoy.com's postcard service within three days, along with an order not to "disclose the existence of the United States' application or [the] order, or the existence of any investigation" to the sender of the email messages "or to any other person" until further order by the Court. [read post]
