Search for: "Doe One: Unknown Identity" Results 1 - 20 of 1,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm by Hakemi
One way to address this problem is to start the lawsuit by referring to the unidentified defendants as “John Does. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
’ This can obviously prove problematic if the respondent’s identity is unknown. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
Inc. v County of Westchester, 29 Misc.3d 1219(A)One of the issues in this CPLR Article 78 action was the “Naming of Unknown Petitioners” as plaintiffs by the Westchester County Correction Officers Benevolent Association.County Court Judge Jeffrey A. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 7:42 am by Charles Scholle
The uninsured motorist statute states that it is the proper statute to use when the identity of one of the drivers is unknown. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm by LTA-Editor
By Max Burke Nutritional supplement company Ubervita filed a lawsuit this month against John Does, claiming the “unknown defendants have conspired to disrupt Ubervita’s business through a campaign of dirty tricks. [read post]
John Doe, No. 09–15869 ( October 26, 2011) Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida John Doe (real name unknown at time of appeal) appealed his convictions for aggravated identity theft, claiming that the government did not produce sufficient evidence that Doe knew the name and social security number he used in applying for a United States passport belonged to an actual… [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
  Sometimes, as was the case in the other recent trademark complaint with a "John Doe" defendant, revealing the identity of the unknown defendant is largely procedural. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
In situations like this, the plaintiff seeking to unmask an unknown defendant will file its complaint against one or more “John Does,” then ask the court for leave to serve discovery prior to the Rule 26(f) conference. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 Brown does not expressly address whether a plaintiff can attempt to assign fault to an unknown tortfeasor under the facts of the instant case. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm by Bruce Nye
"  So it is standard practice in a state court complaint for a plaintiff to sue the known defendants and add as defendants "Does I through XXV," or some such, directing the charging allegations generally against all defendants and alleging something along the lines of "the true names and capacities of the defendants named herein as Does I through XXV are unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues them under these fictitious names. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 11:01 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
One should note this court’s willingness to permit early discovery as being in contrast to another court’s recent apparent disdain for a copyright troll plaintiff seeking the identity of an anonymous online infringer. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown ([2015] EWHC 2628 (QB))(16 September 2015) Warby J granted a permanent injunction against the unknown operators of the “Solicitors from Hell UK” website. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
App. 2001) (also holding that Brown does not extend to uninsured motorist suits, “as the instant case presents a situation where the unknown motorist’s fault can lead to the entry of a judgment, Brown does not prevent the defendants in this litigation from attempting to have fault allocated to the phantom driver”). [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am by John Elwood
This week’s installment will be brief, because there’s only one newly relisted case: Dubin v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Ian Hu
(Did I mention I also learned idioms, unknown to me for the first two decades of my life, and use and abuse them as often as I can, to show, again, that I am one of you? [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, Emma Identity (Emma) is hoping to change that. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 6:56 am by INFORRM
Does Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown highlight how courts should approach anonymity in online cases? [read post]