Search for: "Doe Partnerships, Corporations or Other Entities 1-20"
Results 221 - 240
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2023, 7:10 pm
An initial term that does not start on January 1 will end on December 31st of the following year and then follow the yearly renewal cycles thereafter. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:27 pm
Other Businesses That Can Benefit While the core content is geared towards businesses with $1 million to $5 million in annual revenue and funded startups, the Ultimate Business Owner’s Handbook can also benefit other businesses such as:Businesses with annual revenues between $5 million and $20 millionNew businesses and startups without secured fundingFor new businesses and startups without secured funding, you’ll find valuable… [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
No bad cases, because we don’t do the other side’s research for them.Bauman, of course, held that unless a corporation is incorporated or has its principal place of business in a particular jurisdiction, it’s hard as heck for a non-resident plaintiff (one not injured in that jurisdiction) to sue such a corporation there. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
The DRLL does not, at present, apply to Covered Entities which are partnerships. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:51 pm
Accordingly, I hereby proclaim: Section 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:21 pm
There were approximately 532 Regional Centers on June 20, 2014. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Previously, owners of S corporations, limited liability companies (LLCs), and partnerships paid this tax every other year in the amount of $250. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
This can be very burdensome to the taxpayer since debt forgiveness does not generate cash and the taxpayer may not have other cash to pay the tax. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
So, how does a divorcing party in Illinois even begin to ask for the other spouse’s entire financial status and history? [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
§ 56:8-1(d) defines “The term “person” as used in this act [to] include any natural person or his legal representative, partnership, corporation, company, trust, business entity or association, and any agent, employee, salesman, partner, officer, director, member, stockholder, associate, trustee or cestuis que trustent thereof. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
The digital advertising tax language describes in the broadest of terms the type of entity potentially subject to be “an individual, receiver, trustee, guardian, personal representative, fiduciary, or representative of any kind and any partnership, firm, association, corporation, or other entity” derived from digital advertising services in the state. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
Under the dominion of the separate legal entity doctrine, this is problematic, for the individual corporation has only limited “assets”. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
As an example, a distribution from a DAF to a college for payment of a donor’s child tuition would be a prohibited benefit warranting a penalty tax. * A related person includes a member of the donor or donor advisor’s family (spouse, ancestors, children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and the spouses of children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren) and any 35-percent controlled entity (i.e., entity in which the donor and donor advisors own more than 35% of… [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
The Android situation is even worse than the one on the search engine: on Android, app developers like my company are completely barred from using COVID-related keywords, as opposed to merely giving preferential treatment to governmental entities. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:57 pm
This issue originally stems from a 1996 California State Board of Equalization decision in Appeal of Amman & Schmid Finanz AG,27 which held that corporate limited partners were not doing business in California simply because they had interests as limited partners in limited partnerships that engaged in business in California. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:12 pm
Clark, “The Union of Law and Equity,” 25 Columbia Law Review 1-10 (1925). [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm
Section 16 filings are required for “corporate insiders” (including beneficial owners of 10% or more of a registered voting equity security). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
Partnership v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:16 pm
If the pension plan currently does not allow distributions to anyone other than to a spouse, this provision in the PPA will not help you. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:17 pm
Greg Lambert 0:20 And I’m Greg Lambert. [read post]
