Search for: "Doe Physicians 1-40" Results 1 - 20 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am by Susan Brenner
Ohio Revised Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(d) says that the physician-patient privilege “does not apply” in any criminal action against a physician or dentist. [read post]
The proposed rule is currently silent on what, if any, steps are required if the auxiliary personnel learn that the ordered ADI test does not adhere to the specified AUC criteria. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:10 am by Robert Kreisman
Doe was diagnosed with gestational diabetes, and her treating physicians told her that she would be induced to deliver the child at 39-40 weeks. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: $1 Million Settlement for Patient Injured by Failure to Identify and Repair Negligently Sutured Ureters $500,000 Jury Verdict for Patient Injured by Surgical Negligence During D&C $383,000 Cook County Jury Verdict in Medical Malpractice Injuries After Hysterectomy The post State Appellate Court Holds Clinic Liable for Physician’s Negligent Surgery Even After Doctor Was Dismissed from Case appeared first on Chicago Medical Malpractice Attorney Blog. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:18 pm
However, the attending physician does not state how the fetal status was evaluated without th [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:29 pm
He pegged the population of inpatients under hospitalist care at 30%-40%. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  AMA Provision H-265.993, concerning “Peer Review of Medical Expert Witness Testimony,” states that:[15] “AMA policy is that: (1) the giving of medico-legal testimony by a physician expert witness be considered the practice of medicine, and (2) all medico-legal expert witness testimony given by a physician should be subject to peer review. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:37 am
" The question "does a diagnosis by a doctor rendering a second and correct opinion, equate to a per se reasonable belief that the previous treating physicians committed medical malpractice" can be interpreted in more than one way. [read post]