Search for: "Doe Shareholders 1-100"
Results 21 - 40
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[43] But section 14(a) does not specifically preempt state corporate law or even specifically mention shareholder proposals. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Which is precisely what my new book, The Profit Motive: In Defense of Shareholder Value Maximization, does. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:14 am
” Section 1, in turn, specifies a price of $100, payable within six months. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 12:35 pm
., Dec. 20, 2007), read opinion here, the Chancery Court, in this epic decision of over 100 pages in its original format, recounts a generation-long procedural history in connection with a textbook-length discussion of the public policy considerations related to the time period within which one must, or should, bring a claim against a dissolved corporation or its shareholders and directors. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:32 am
For example, in the United States, shareholders currently need only own 1% or $2,000 of a company’s shares to submit a proposal for inclusion on a company’s ballot. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:32 am
For example, in the United States, shareholders currently need only own 1% or $2,000 of a company’s shares to submit a proposal for inclusion on a company’s ballot. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:45 am
However, the rule does not specify the earliest date that a nominating shareholder can file a notice on Schedule 14N. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
For example, Vanguard could offer an S&P500 light (dark) green fund, ready to vote in favor of all shareholder resolutions that promote a greener economy, as long as their cost of reducing CO2 emission does not exceed $100 ($200) per ton. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
But following this line of reasoning to its bizarre conclusion could mean that any suit involving a corporation with 100 or more shareholders would qualify as a mass action. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:18 pm
Suppose Shareholder bought 100 shares of the corporation’s stock. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:42 am
The data in the below tables and in the detailed chart does not include companies conducting Say-On-Pay votes that are mandated by virtue of the company's participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program and also does not include companies that voluntarily held Say-On-Pay votes (e.g., companies which held their annual shareholder meeting shortly before the January 21, 2011 effective date for Say-On-Pay but which nevertheless opted to voluntarily hold a… [read post]
26 May 2023, 9:44 am
The Act is expected to receive royal assent and will then be in force on January 1, 2024. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 12:47 am
The report does note that plaintiffs challenged fewer deals valued below $1 billion. 96 percent of deals valued at $1 billion drew at least one lawsuit, but for deals valued under $1 billion, the percentage of deals attracting a lawsuit declined slightly to 89 percent in 2014 from 94 percent in 2013. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:02 am
Only 23% of plaintiff fee awards were $1 million or higher, while 44 percent were at or under $500,000 or under. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 1:57 pm
S-corporations are limited to no more than 100 shareholders, and all shareholders must be United States citizens or permanent residents. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 9:01 pm
[9] Telecommunications Entrepreneur Indicted and Arrested in $200 Million Tax Evasion Case, supra note 1 [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 6:58 pm
The 2017 letter, published on the company’s website on Saturday morning, does not disappoint. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:03 pm
Three Two quick comments. 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:01 am
The ABA has just published its list of 100 law blogs, a list that includes the Race to the Bottom. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
But that does not mean issuers can take the Sample Letter lightly. [read post]
