Search for: "Doe Shareholders 1-100" Results 61 - 80 of 753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
  First, the survey only captures board practices of the top 50 companies within the Fortune 100, and thus does not speak directly to board practices generally. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 2:58 am
If I pay only $100for an item for which I promised to pay $200, and I am later ordered by a court to pay the additional $100, I should not be able to claim the additional $100 as an insurable loss. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:11 am
As of Jan. 1, ISS is tracking almost 450 governance-related shareholder resolutions for the 2007 proxy season. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Eccles (Saïd Business School), Richard Gardiner, and Andrea Webster, World Benchmarking Alliance, on Friday, April 26, 2024 Tags: Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, CSDDD, EU, Sustainability That Starbucks DEI Case Doesn’t Stand for What You Think It Does Posted by Scott Shepard, Stefan Padfield, and Ethan Peck (The National Center for Public Policy Research), on Saturday, April 27, 2024 Tags: dei, discrimination, Race, Shareholders, Starbucks … [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Eccles (Saïd Business School), Richard Gardiner, and Andrea Webster, World Benchmarking Alliance, on Friday, April 26, 2024 Tags: Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, CSDDD, EU, Sustainability That Starbucks DEI Case Doesn’t Stand for What You Think It Does Posted by Scott Shepard, Stefan Padfield, and Ethan Peck (The National Center for Public Policy Research), on Saturday, April 27, 2024 Tags: dei, discrimination, Race, Shareholders, Starbucks … [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Jeffrey W. Berkman, Esq.
  Ownership restrictions:  Limited to 100 shareholders, all of whom must be individuals, and none of which can be foreigners (i.e., shareholders must be US citizens or residents).2. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:40 pm by admin
  There may be just one person owning 1 share (even though the corporation is authorized to issue up to 100 in the example above). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A separate data breach, which apparently took place or began during 2013 but that Yahoo first announced in December 2016, affected over 1 billion user accounts. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:09 am by Steve Dickinson
Here is what we know so far on how the regulators intend to proceed: 1. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The granting of the injunction would also mean that the claimant would retain 100 per cent of the existing business, notwithstanding the 58 per cent shareholding of the majority shareholders. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:38 am
Investors are watching to see how companies respond to more than 100 shareholder resolutions that received majority support in 2007 - and companies that fail to respond will likely face the same proposals in 2008. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:55 pm by James Hamilton
While the $10 million threshold has been incrementally increased over the years from the $1 million level initially set in 1964, the 500 shareholder of record requirement has never been updated. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:50 am by Jeff Gittins
Tim HawkesHouse Bill 84, which was recommended by the Executive Water Rights Task Force, clarifies that: (1) an approved nonuse application excuses the requirement of beneficial use from the nonuse application's filing date; (2) the filing or approval of a nonuse application, or a series of nonuse applications, does not constitute beneficial use or protect a water right that is already subject to forfeiture; and (3) a nonuse application does not bar a water right… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Here's how Justice Pines explains it: [T]his is a case, where dissolution does not appear to the Court to be in the best interests of the majority shareholder, who has reached 87 years of age, nor is it the only solution to provide the minority shareholder with his due, in view of the significant amount of real property held by the five subject corporations. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:07 am by Ian Barlow, Associate
McDowell, 794 F.2d 100, 110 (3d Cir. 1986) (indicating that a trustee does not violate his duty if it is “prudent to refrain from bringing an action”) (citation omitted). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by michael brennan
    1) Consider how much protection from personal liability you will need. [read post]