Search for: "Doe VI " Results 1 - 20 of 5,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2023, 4:53 pm by Uthman Law Office
The Court of Appeal held that  the RJA does not violate article VI, section 13 of the California Constitution. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Department of Education to treat Sikhs as an ethnic group as well as a religion so that discrimination against Sikhs would fall under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:37 pm by Jeff Lieberman and Neil Abramson
Class VI wells are used to inject and permanently store carbon dioxide in underground geologic formations. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
However, Title VI does not mention religious discrimination.In 2004, OCR said Title VI covers discrimination against Jewish students even if they are Caucasian and American born. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Perhaps one or more Justices would be content to impose a complete categorical bar (including in the Title VII context), but that would mean uprooting more than Bakke/Grutter.Thus, Title VI does not provide a doctrinally easier way for the Court to invalidate affirmative action than does equal protection--which is not to say that UNC or Harvard will prevail (but that's my legal realism talking again). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The bill is a reaction to the position taken by the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights that Title VI does not apply to anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students, and by implication members of other groups that have both religious and ethnic characteristics. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 7:59 pm by Howard Friedman
The letter clarifies that even though Title VI does not specifically cover religious discrimination, many types of antisemitic and Islamophobic attacks fall under other types of discrimination covered by Title VI. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:43 pm
Va. in his latest opinion (Doe VI) strayed beyond the mandate from the Fourth Circuit following its latest opinion (Doe V) reversing the post-remand decision by the District Court (Doe IV) in this long-running Privacy Act case that was the subject of an earlier Supreme Court opinion (Doe III) that affirmed the first Fourth Circuit opinion (Doe II) that reversed the District Court's opinion (Doe I).Judge Wilkinson observed:… [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:06 am by Alexander J. Davie
Title V does not impose any deadline on the SEC to carry out this rulemaking directive. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 12:02 pm by Chris Sutton
  But Title VI does not prevent educational institutions from engaging in diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DET”) activities, according to the OCR. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:09 am by Steve Dickinson
So it does not matter whether or not the Draft is adopted in its current form. [read post]
Importantly, this does not mean that environmental justice analyses are not required for Louisiana permits. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:00 pm
If an employee embezzles money that belongs to his employer, the ground for liability vis-a-vis the employer would, in fact, be tort (‘onrechtmatige daad'). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  While Title VI does not cover discrimination based on religion, individuals who face discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin do not lose protection under Title VI for also being a member of a group that shares common religious practices. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 6:50 am by Goldstein Law Firm
State Franchise Relationship Laws – State franchise relationship laws give active franchisees certain legal rights vis-à-vis their franchisors. [read post]
Importantly, the injunction does not affect the consideration of disparate impacts and cumulative impacts in the context of environmental justice under NEPA in federal permitting. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It does not, in other words, merely treat Stanford like Berkeley or USC like UCLA. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:35 am by The Docket Navigator
"[T]he program does not necessarily enhance the patent expertise of the participating districts vis-à-vis other districts. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 12:35 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It does offense, in the form of both stealing secrets and cyber operations in the covert and military contexts. [read post]