Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 61 - 80
of 5,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 2:19 pm
§ 841(b)(1)(B)(vi) — requiring a 5-year minimum sentence where the offense involved “10 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of any analogue of” fentanyl — even if it does not qualify as a “controlled substance analogue” under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 2:34 pm
It has amended the Merchant Shipping Act to allow an Order in Council to be made to bring in regulations, but does not yet appear to have yet promulgated any. [read post]
24 May 2021, 9:48 am
Thus, it does not have the requisite degree of distinctiveness to support a finding of dilution, at least vis-à -vis respondent’s use of the term as part of the mark SPAM ARREST for computer software designed to eliminate unsolicited commercial email. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:37 am
Thus, it does not have the requisite degree of distinctiveness to support a finding of dilution, at least vis-à -vis respondent’s use of the term as part of the mark SPAM ARREST for computer software designed to eliminate unsolicited commercial email. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 6:11 am
Others argue that these forces have little effect on CEO compensation because of frictions such as managerial entrenchment, asymmetric information, and transaction costs of replacing managers, believing instead that compensation practices are by and large driven by the bargaining power that the CEO has vis-à-vis the board (e.g., Bebchuk and Fried, 2003). [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:30 am
It is not law of the United States within the meaning of Articles III or VI of the Constitution, and so does not serve as a basis for federal question jurisdiction or override contrary state law. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:04 am
Lowell Brown at the Article VI blog calls the evidence to our attention.. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:38 am
GPS UPDATE: So after all the discussion yesterday, I'm thinking of getting the Garmin nà ¼vi 350 -- price has been chopped and it does very well in customer reviews. [read post]
9 May 2022, 12:55 pm
VI We end this opinion where we began. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:15 am
In 2006, DOE as well as the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:20 am
To my surprise two posts refer to CEO's and outside counsel selection (See my post of Oct. 23, 2005: CEO's involved in selection of law firms; Nov. 11, 2005: involvement in choice of outside counsel; As with all metaposts, the leftovers fall into every which topic (See my post of July 31, 2005: proximity of GC's office to CEO's; Jan. 4, 2006: to shake up department, Feb. 10, 2007: CEO is a notable constraint GCs operate under; May 28, 2007: how often does CEO talk to… [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 12:22 pm
Or, put another way, it says what employers can and cannot do vis-à-vis their employees. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 9:29 am
Napper for his lost profits analysis does not account for what 'all Pro VI users [would] play in the absence of that ball.'" "[A]ccording to [defendant], Mr. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:11 am
The post Building A Legal Practice Designed To Last (Part VI) appeared first on MINICK LAW. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:57 am
As noted in my blog of April 4, the EBSA has issued FAQs VI on the Affordable Care Act (the "Act"). [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm
However, the difference does become visible afterwards. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:48 am
Is there something in the notion of "rent-seeking" that might explain why the actions of an NPE vis-à-vis a patent are criticized, but the same action taken by the original owner of the patent is not? [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:37 pm
I was quickly glancing at an article I thought might interest me enough to be bloggable, and the first thing I saw was this:However, what Article VI does not do, and was never intended to do, is deny me the right to say, as loudly as I may choose, that I will on no account vote for a smirking hick like Mike Huckabee, who is an unusually stupid primate but who does not have the elementary intelligence to recognize the fact that this is what he is. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:27 pm
Since the Equal Protection Clause does not does not prohibit mere disparate impact, neither does Title VI. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 12:15 pm
HOW DOES THE APPEAL PROCESS WORK? [read post]
