Search for: "Doe v. Miller" Results 141 - 160 of 3,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 4:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
For claim 7 of the ’186 patent, the Board exceeded the scope of our remand when it considered a combination of Miller and Lessner. [read post]
11 May 2009, 5:58 am by Gary Nitzkin
I just read the Sixth Circuit's opinion in Miller v Javitch, Block & Rathbone, 561 F.3d 588 (2009). [read post]
11 May 2009, 5:58 am by Gary Nitzkin
I just read the Sixth Circuit's opinion in Miller v Javitch, Block & Rathbone, 561 F.3d 588 (2009). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:26 am
  But if I had to choose, I'd probably say that Judge Ikuta's dissent has the better of the argument over Judge Kozinski's majority opinion.Judge Kozinski, as he sometimes does, pitches his opinion with mystery and guile, commencing his missive with the following introductory paragraph:"This is a strange case. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Straightforward legal principles asking about justification, having analysed, objectively, the impact. 11:34: Michael Fordham QC starts his submissions on behalf of the Counsel General for Wales 11:34: Ronan Lavery QC closes his submissions. 11:31: Ronan Lavery QC returns to the fact that Parliament does have an obligation to protect NI’s interests and that is the essence of the submissions – this is not merely a political game. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:38 am
 Further, although no law explicitly permits unincorporated associations to enter into contracts, the Court indicated that this is a long-recognized and uncontroversial power (see Miller v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:49 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Juvenile lifer Ray CarpA few years ago, we tracked the Miller v Alabama case as it went to the SCOTUS to decide whether juveniles could be given life sentences. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:22 pm by Peter J. Cavanaugh
AIA, J.D.Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC On July 11, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court decided the case of Miller-Davis v. [read post]